Literature DB >> 17613400

Observational study with everolimus (Certican) in combination with low-dose cyclosporine in de novo heart transplant recipients.

Hans B Lehmkuhl1, Daniel Mai, Michael Dandel, Christoph Knosalla, Nicola E Hiemann, Onnen Grauhan, Michael Huebler, Miralem Pasic, Yuguo Weng, Rudolph Meyer, Markus Rothenburger, Manfred Hummel, Roland Hetzer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/
METHODS: This observational study reports on immunosuppression with cyclosporine (CsA) in 38 de novo heart transplant recipients receiving everolimus compared with 14 patients receiving mycophenolate mofetil (MMF).
RESULTS: Mean (+/- SD) everolimus C0 blood levels remained stable within 5 to 7 ng/ml. Mean CsA C0 blood levels were reduced by 47%, from 240 +/- 57 ng/ml at 2 weeks post-transplant to 128 +/- 38 ng/ml at Month 6 and by 58% to 101 +/- 26 ng/ml at Month 12 in the everolimus group, compared to 18% from 246 +/- 54 ng/ml at 2 weeks post-transplant to 201 +/- 48 ng/ml at Month 6 and by 35% to 160 +/- 41 ng/ml in MMF patients. Efficacy was high with a rejection rate of 23.6% (everolimus) vs 28.5% (MMF) by Month 12. Mean pre-transplant serum creatinine levels of 1.67 +/- 0.59 mg/dl decreased to 1.53 +/- 0.57 mg/dl under everolimus and increased from 1.22 +/- 0.36 to 1.99 +/- 0.75 mg/dl in the MMF group by Month 12 post-transplant. However, calculated GFR declined in both groups by Month 12 (everolimus: from 71 +/- 29 to 57 +/- 27 ml/min/1.73 m2; MMF: from 73 +/- 22 to 44 +/- 24 ml/min/1.73 m2), with stabilization after 3 to 6 months in everolimus-treated patients and after 6 to 9 months in MMF-treated patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Everolimus allows marked reduction of CsA exposure without significant loss of efficacy and also provides early protection of renal function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17613400     DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2007.02.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant        ISSN: 1053-2498            Impact factor:   10.247


  6 in total

Review 1.  Chronic renal insufficiency in heart transplant recipients: risk factors and management options.

Authors:  Francisco González-Vílchez; José Antonio Vázquez de Prada
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  Everolimus in heart transplantation: an update.

Authors:  Stephan W Hirt; Christoph Bara; Markus J Barten; Tobias Deuse; Andreas O Doesch; Ingo Kaczmarek; Uwe Schulz; Jörg Stypmann; Assad Haneya; Hans B Lehmkuhl
Journal:  J Transplant       Date:  2013-12-05

3.  Prescription trends of immunosuppressive drugs in post-heart transplant recipients in Taiwan, 2000-2009.

Authors:  Chia-Lin Chou; Chia-Yu Chou; Ying-Yu Huang; Min-Shan Wu; Chia-Chen Hsu; Yueh-Ching Chou
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 2.890

4.  The CECARI Study: Everolimus (Certican®) Initiation and Calcineurin Inhibitor Withdrawal in Maintenance Heart Transplant Recipients with Renal Insufficiency: A Multicenter, Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Jan Van Keer; David Derthoo; Olivier Van Caenegem; Michel De Pauw; Eric Nellessen; Nathalie Duerinckx; Walter Droogne; Gábor Vörös; Bart Meyns; Ann Belmans; Stefan Janssens; Johan Van Cleemput; Johan Vanhaecke
Journal:  J Transplant       Date:  2017-02-20

5.  Effect of everolimus rescue therapy for acute cellular rejection following pediatric living donor liver transplantation: Report of one case.

Authors:  Shin Hwang; Jung-Man Namgoong; Seak Hee Oh; Kyung Mo Kim; Chul-Soo Ahn; Hyunhee Kwon; Yu Jeong Cho; Yong Jae Kwon
Journal:  Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2020-05-31

6.  Efficacy and safety of low-dose everolimus as maintenance immunosuppression in cardiac transplant recipients.

Authors:  Uwe Fuchs; Armin Zittermann; Uwe Schulz; Jan F Gummert
Journal:  J Transplant       Date:  2012-04-17
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.