Literature DB >> 17613304

Microscopic methods for measuring the elasticity of gel substrates for cell culture: microspheres, microindenters, and atomic force microscopy.

Margo T Frey1, Adam Engler, Dennis E Discher, Juliet Lee, Yu-Li Wang.   

Abstract

In conjunction with surface chemistry, the mechanical properties of cell culture substrates provide important biological cues that affect cell behavior including growth, differentiation, spreading, and migration. The phenomenon has led to the increased use of biological and synthetic polymer-based flexible substrates in cell culture studies. However, widely used methods for measuring the Young's modulus have proven difficult in the characterization of these materials, as they tend to be relatively thin, soft, hydrated, and tethered to glass substrates. Here we describe three methods that have been applied successfully to probe the flexibility of soft culture substrates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17613304     DOI: 10.1016/S0091-679X(07)83003-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Cell Biol        ISSN: 0091-679X            Impact factor:   1.441


  26 in total

1.  Strength in the periphery: growth cone biomechanics and substrate rigidity response in peripheral and central nervous system neurons.

Authors:  Daniel Koch; William J Rosoff; Jiji Jiang; Herbert M Geller; Jeffrey S Urbach
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Mapping three-dimensional stress and strain fields within a soft hydrogel using a fluorescence microscope.

Authors:  Matthew S Hall; Rong Long; Chung-Yuen Hui; Mingming Wu
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 3.  Probing cellular microenvironments and tissue remodeling by atomic force microscopy.

Authors:  Thomas Ludwig; Robert Kirmse; Kate Poole; Ulrich S Schwarz
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2007-12-06       Impact factor: 3.657

4.  Effects of gel thickness on microscopic indentation measurements of gel modulus.

Authors:  Rong Long; Matthew S Hall; Mingming Wu; Chung-Yuen Hui
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  The nano-scale mechanical properties of the extracellular matrix regulate dermal fibroblast function.

Authors:  Volker F Achterberg; Lara Buscemi; Heike Diekmann; Josiane Smith-Clerc; Helge Schwengler; Jean-Jacques Meister; Horst Wenck; Stefan Gallinat; Boris Hinz
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 8.551

6.  Microtubule depolymerization induces traction force increase through two distinct pathways.

Authors:  Andrew Rape; Wei-hui Guo; Yu-li Wang
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 5.285

7.  The regulation of traction force in relation to cell shape and focal adhesions.

Authors:  Andrew D Rape; Wei-Hui Guo; Yu-Li Wang
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 12.479

8.  Stiffness Measurement of Soft Silicone Substrates for Mechanobiology Studies Using a Widefield Fluorescence Microscope.

Authors:  Yashar Bashirzadeh; Siddharth Chatterji; Dakota Palmer; Sandeep Dumbali; Shizhi Qian; Venkat Maruthamuthu
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 1.355

9.  Stiffness-controlled three-dimensional extracellular matrices for high-resolution imaging of cell behavior.

Authors:  Robert S Fischer; Kenneth A Myers; Margaret L Gardel; Clare M Waterman
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 13.491

Review 10.  Techniques for assessing 3-D cell-matrix mechanical interactions in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Miguel Miron-Mendoza; Vindhya Koppaka; Chengxin Zhou; W Matthew Petroll
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  2013-06-29       Impact factor: 3.905

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.