Literature DB >> 17613128

Effects of low and high LET radiations on bystander human lung fibroblast cell survival.

Rajamanickam Baskar1, Adayabalam S Balajee, Charles R Geard.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This investigation is aimed to determine the role of low LET (linear energy transfer, gamma-rays) and high LET (alpha-particles) radiations on bystander effect of using the same type of cells and its implications on colony-forming efficiency from a single cell.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Normal human fetal lung (MRC-5), immortalized repair deficient ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) (GM5,849C) and normal (GM637H) fibroblast cells were used. Colony-forming efficiency in bystander cells (GM637H) was studied using the medium transfer technique from the two donor (MRC-5 and GM5,849C) cells and the procedure followed for bystander treatment is presented schematically in Figure 1. Evidence of change in colony formation in bystander cells, was assessed by scavenging nitric oxide (NO).
RESULTS: Enhancement of 10 - 30% in colony-forming efficiency was observed in bystander GM637H cells treated with irradiated conditioned medium (ICM) from MRC-5 cells collected 1 h after different doses of either gamma-rays (1, 2.5, 5 and 10 Gy) or alpha particles (0.25, 0.5, 1 and 2.5 Gy) irradiation. Similar results were obtained when ICM derived from the ATM (GM5,849C) cells. However, the stimulation was not dose dependent. Furthermore, we also show that the increase in dilutions of ICM (1:1, 1:5 and 1:10) showed an inverse correlation with cloning efficiency. Treatment of MRC-5 cells with PTIO (2-phenyl-4, 4, 5, 5-tetramethylimidazoline-1-oxyl-3-oxide) a NO scavenger, 1 h prior to irradiation reduced the enhancement of ICM mediated cell survival.
CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, though both the low and high LET radiations enhanced the clonogenic potential of the bystander recipient cells, medium from the ATM defective (GM5,849C) cells after gamma-irradiation showed less stimulating effect than the medium from the normal (MRC-5) cells. However, after alpha-irradiation an inverse effect was seen. NO may play an important role in enhancing the growth potential in these bystander cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17613128     DOI: 10.1080/09553000701384499

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol        ISSN: 0955-3002            Impact factor:   2.694


  13 in total

1.  Whole-genome gene expression profiling reveals the major role of nitric oxide in mediating the cellular transcriptional response to ionizing radiation in normal human fibroblasts.

Authors:  Mykyta V Sokolov; Igor G Panyutin; Ronald D Neumann
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 5.736

2.  Emerging role of radiation induced bystander effects: Cell communications and carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Rajamanickam Baskar
Journal:  Genome Integr       Date:  2010-09-12

3.  Protein kinase C epsilon is involved in ionizing radiation induced bystander response in human cells.

Authors:  Burong Hu; Bo Shen; Yanrong Su; Charles R Geard; Adayabalam S Balajee
Journal:  Int J Biochem Cell Biol       Date:  2009-07-03       Impact factor: 5.085

4.  LET-dependent bystander effects caused by irradiation of human prostate carcinoma cells with X rays or alpha particles.

Authors:  Vered Anzenberg; Sarika Chandiramani; Jeffrey A Coderre
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.841

5.  Cytochrome-c mediated a bystander response dependent on inducible nitric oxide synthase in irradiated hepatoma cells.

Authors:  M He; S Ye; R Ren; C Dong; Y Xie; D Yuan; C Shao
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 6.  Mechanisms and biological importance of photon-induced bystander responses: do they have an impact on low-dose radiation responses.

Authors:  Masanori Tomita; Munetoshi Maeda
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 2.724

Review 7.  Biological response of cancer cells to radiation treatment.

Authors:  Rajamanickam Baskar; Jiawen Dai; Nei Wenlong; Richard Yeo; Kheng-Wei Yeoh
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2014-11-17

Review 8.  Mechanisms of radiation toxicity in transformed and non-transformed cells.

Authors:  Ronald-Allan M Panganiban; Andrew L Snow; Regina M Day
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Assessment of targeted and non-targeted responses in cells deficient in ATM function following exposure to low and high dose X-rays.

Authors:  Anne Kiuru; Meerit Kämäräinen; Sirpa Heinävaara; Katri Pylkäs; Kim Chapman; Armi Koivistoinen; Teuvo Parviainen; Robert Winqvist; Munira Kadhim; Virpi Launonen; Carita Lindholm
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The role of target and bystander cells in dose-response relationship of radiation-induced bystander effects in two cell lines.

Authors:  Shokouhozaman Soleymanifard; Mohammad Taghi Bahreyni Toossi; Ameneh Sazgarnia; Shokoufe Mohebbi
Journal:  Iran J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.699

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.