Literature DB >> 17612816

Reaction time inconsistency in a spatial stroop task: age-related differences through childhood and adulthood.

Benjamin R Williams1, Esther H Strauss, David F Hultsch, Michael A Hunter.   

Abstract

Age-related differences in inconsistency of reaction time (RT) across the life span were examined on a task with differing levels of demand on executive control. A total of 546 participants, aged 5 to 76 years, completed a spatial Stroop task that permitted observations under three conditions (congruent, incongruent, and neutral) according to the correspondence between the required response (based on stimulus direction) and stimulus location. An interference effect was observed across all ages. Analyses of neutral condition data replicated previous research demonstrating RT inconsistency follows a U-shaped developmental curve across the life span. The relationship between age and inconsistency, however, depended on condition: inconsistency in the congruent condition was higher than inconsistency in both the neutral and incongruent conditions across middle-aged groups. Reaction time inconsistency may reflect processing efficiency that is maximal in young adulthood and may also be sensitive to fluctuations in performance that reflect momentarily highly efficient responding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17612816     DOI: 10.1080/13825580600584590

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn        ISSN: 1382-5585


  12 in total

1.  Time-structured and net intraindividual variability: tools for examining the development of dynamic characteristics and processes.

Authors:  Nilam Ram; Denis Gerstorf
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2009-12

2.  Aerobic fitness and response variability in preadolescent children performing a cognitive control task.

Authors:  Chien-Ting Wu; Matthew B Pontifex; Lauren B Raine; Laura Chaddock; Michelle W Voss; Arthur F Kramer; Charles H Hillman
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  Cohort-Sequential Study of Conflict Inhibition during Middle Childhood.

Authors:  Leslie Rollins; Tracy Riggins
Journal:  Int J Behav Dev       Date:  2016-06-23

4.  Working memory and intraindividual variability in processing speed: A lifespan developmental and individual-differences study.

Authors:  Nathalie Mella; Delphine Fagot; Thierry Lecerf; Anik de Ribaupierre
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-04

5.  Decomposing intra-subject variability in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  Adriana Di Martino; Manely Ghaffari; Jocelyn Curchack; Philip Reiss; Christopher Hyde; Marina Vannucci; Eva Petkova; Donald F Klein; F Xavier Castellanos
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 13.382

6.  Aerobic fitness and intra-individual variability of neurocognition in preadolescent children.

Authors:  Robert Davis Moore; Chien-Ting Wu; Matthew B Pontifex; Kevin C O'Leary; Mark R Scudder; Lauren B Raine; Christopher R Johnson; Charles H Hillman
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2013-03-16       Impact factor: 2.310

7.  Age-related differences in the neural correlates of trial-to-trial variations of reaction time.

Authors:  Nancy E Adleman; Gang Chen; Richard C Reynolds; Anna Frackman; Varun Razdan; Daniel H Weissman; Daniel S Pine; Ellen Leibenluft
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 6.464

8.  The Negative Influence of Adiposity Extends to Intraindividual Variability in Cognitive Control Among Preadolescent Children.

Authors:  Morgan R Chojnacki; Lauren B Raine; Eric S Drollette; Mark R Scudder; Arthur F Kramer; Charles H Hillman; Naiman A Khan
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 5.002

9.  Intra-Individual Variability of Error Awareness and Post-error Slowing in Three Different Age-Groups.

Authors:  Fabio Masina; Elisa Di Rosa; Daniela Mapelli
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-06-05

Review 10.  Age differences in intra-individual variability in simple and choice reaction time: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dominika Dykiert; Geoff Der; John M Starr; Ian J Deary
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.