Literature DB >> 17612621

Elimination of altered karyotypes by sexual reproduction preserves species identity.

Henry H Q Heng1.   

Abstract

Resolving the persistence of sexual reproduction despite its overwhelming costs (known as the paradox of sex) is one of the most persistent challenges of evolutionary biology. In thinking about this paradox, the focus has traditionally been on the evolutionary benefits of genetic recombination in generating offspring diversity and purging deleterious mutations. The similarity of pattern between evolution of organisms and evolution among cancer cells suggests that the asexual process generates more diverse genomes owing to less controlled reproduction systems, while sexual reproduction generates more stable genomes because the sexual process can serve as a mechanism to "filter out" aberrations at the chromosome level. Our reinterpretation of data from the literature strongly supports this hypothesis. Thus, the principal consequence of sexual reproduction is the reduction of drastic genetic diversity at the genome or chromosome level, resulting in the preservation of species identity rather than the provision of evolutionary diversity for future environmental challenges. Genetic recombination does contribute to genetic diversity, but it does so secondarily and within the framework of the chromosomally defined genome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17612621     DOI: 10.1139/g07-039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome        ISSN: 0831-2796            Impact factor:   2.166


  17 in total

Review 1.  The evolution of sex: a perspective from the fungal kingdom.

Authors:  Soo Chan Lee; Min Ni; Wenjun Li; Cecelia Shertz; Joseph Heitman
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 11.056

2.  The evolution of meiosis from mitosis.

Authors:  Adam S Wilkins; Robin Holliday
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Unstable genomes elevate transcriptome dynamics.

Authors:  Joshua B Stevens; Guo Liu; Batoul Y Abdallah; Steven D Horne; Karen J Ye; Steven W Bremer; Christine J Ye; Stephen A Krawetz; Henry H Heng
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 7.396

4.  Single cell heterogeneity: why unstable genomes are incompatible with average profiles.

Authors:  Batoul Y Abdallah; Steven D Horne; Joshua B Stevens; Guo Liu; Andrew Y Ying; Barbara Vanderhyden; Stephen A Krawetz; Root Gorelick; Henry Hq Heng
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 5.  Evolutionary mysteries in meiosis.

Authors:  Thomas Lenormand; Jan Engelstädter; Susan E Johnston; Erik Wijnker; Christoph R Haag
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Comparison of mitotic cell death by chromosome fragmentation to premature chromosome condensation.

Authors:  Joshua B Stevens; Batoul Y Abdallah; Sarah M Regan; Guo Liu; Steven W Bremer; Christine J Ye; Henry H Heng
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 2.009

7.  Genome based cell population heterogeneity promotes tumorigenicity: the evolutionary mechanism of cancer.

Authors:  Christine J Ye; Joshua B Stevens; Guo Liu; Steven W Bremer; Aruna S Jaiswal; Karen J Ye; Ming-Fong Lin; Lesley Lawrenson; Wayne D Lancaster; Markku Kurkinen; Joshua D Liao; C Gary Gairola; Malathy P V Shekhar; Satya Narayan; Fred R Miller; Henry H Q Heng
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 6.384

Review 8.  The oxidative damage initiation hypothesis for meiosis.

Authors:  Elvira Hörandl; Franz Hadacek
Journal:  Plant Reprod       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 3.767

9.  Stress, genomic adaptation, and the evolutionary trade-off.

Authors:  Steven D Horne; Saroj K Chowdhury; Henry H Q Heng
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 4.599

10.  Why it is crucial to analyze non clonal chromosome aberrations or NCCAs?

Authors:  Henry H Q Heng; Sarah M Regan; Guo Liu; Christine J Ye
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2016-02-13       Impact factor: 2.009

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.