Literature DB >> 17611699

DPD is a molecular determinant of capecitabine efficacy in colorectal cancer.

Daniel Vallböhmer1, Dong Yun Yang, Hidekazu Kuramochi, D Shimizu, Kathleen D Danenberg, Jan Lindebjerg, Jens Nederby Nielsen, Anders Jakobsen, Peter V Danenberg.   

Abstract

Capecitabine is a fluoropyrimidine-based drug that offers physicians a more convenient treatment for advanced colorectal cancer (CRC), with manageable toxicity and antitumor activity comparable to that of continuous-infusion therapies with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). However, there are no validated and established predictive factors for clinical outcome of capecitabine efficacy in CRC. The gene expressions of the pyrimidine metabolism enzymes dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), thymidine phosphorylase (TP) and thymidylate synthase (TS) have previously been shown to be response determinants of fluoropyrimidine-based drugs in various tumors. Therefore, we investigated whether intratumoral mRNA expression levels of these genes are also associated with the clinical outcome of patients with metastatic CRC treated with first-line capecitabine. Thirty-seven patients with metastatic CRC were enrolled in this study and treated with single agent capecitabine. The intratumoral mRNA levels of DPD, TP and TS were assessed from paraffin-embedded tissue samples using laser-capture-microdissection methods and quantitative real-time PCR. There were 20 women and 17 men with a median age of 61 years (range 49-74). The median progression-free survival was 6.7 months (95% CI, 4.8-11.6 months), with a median follow-up of 14.4 months (range 1.3-18.7 months). Complete response was observed in 1 (3%), partial response in 6 (20%), stable disease in 14 (47%) and progressive disease in 9 (30%) patients (response was inevaluable in 7 patients). Higher gene expression levels of DPD were associated with resistance to capecitabine (P=0.032; Kruskal-Wallis test). Patients with a lower mRNA amount of DPD (<or=0.46) had a longer progression-free survival compared with patients that had a higher mRNA amount (8.0 vs. 3.3 months; adjusted P=0.048; log-rank test). This pilot study suggests that intratumoral gene expression levels of DPD may be useful in predicting the clinical outcome of patients with metastatic CRC with first-line single agent capecitabine treatment. Our data should be validated in larger and prospective clinical trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17611699

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oncol        ISSN: 1019-6439            Impact factor:   5.650


  11 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacologic resistance in colorectal cancer: a review.

Authors:  William A Hammond; Abhisek Swaika; Kabir Mody
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 8.168

Review 2.  Pharmacogenetics research on chemotherapy resistance in colorectal cancer over the last 20 years.

Authors:  Mariusz Panczyk
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  FOLFOX/FOLFIRI pharmacogenetics: the call for a personalized approach in colorectal cancer therapy.

Authors:  Beatrice Mohelnikova-Duchonova; Bohuslav Melichar; Pavel Soucek
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Gene expression pathway analysis to predict response to neoadjuvant docetaxel and capecitabine for breast cancer.

Authors:  Larissa A Korde; Lara Lusa; Lisa McShane; Peter F Lebowitz; LuAnne Lukes; Kevin Camphausen; Joel S Parker; Sandra M Swain; Kent Hunter; Jo Anne Zujewski
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Expressions of Thymidylate Synthase,Thymidine Phosphorylase, Class III β-tubulin, and Excision Repair Cross-complementing Group 1predict Response in Advanced Gastric Cancer Patients Receiving Capecitabine Plus Paclitaxel or Cisplatin.

Authors:  Ming Lu; Jing Gao; Xi-Cheng Wang; Lin Shen
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.087

6.  Clinical significance of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase and thymidylate synthase expression in patients with pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Osamu Nakahara; Hiroshi Takamori; Hiroshi Tanaka; Yasuo Sakamoto; Yoshiaki Ikuta; Satoshi Furuhashi; Masayuki Watanabe; Toru Beppu; Masahiko Hirota; Keiichiro Kanemitsu; Hideo Baba
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 7.  Important molecular genetic markers of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Anna V Kudryavtseva; Anastasia V Lipatova; Andrew R Zaretsky; Alexey A Moskalev; Maria S Fedorova; Anastasiya S Rasskazova; Galina A Shibukhova; Anastasiya V Snezhkina; Andrey D Kaprin; Boris Y Alekseev; Alexey A Dmitriev; George S Krasnov
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-08-16

8.  Study protocol on the role of intestinal microbiota in colorectal cancer treatment: a pathway to personalized medicine 2.0.

Authors:  R Aarnoutse; J M P G M de Vos-Geelen; J Penders; E G Boerma; F A R M Warmerdam; B Goorts; S W M Olde Damink; Z Soons; S S M Rensen; M L Smidt
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase Levels in Colorectal Cancer Cells Treated with a Combination of Heat Shock Protein 90 Inhibitor and Oxaliplatin or Capecitabine.

Authors:  Mahshid Mohammadian; Shima Zeynali-Moghaddam; Mohammad Hassan Khadem Ansari; Yousef Rasmi; Anahita Fathi Azarbayjani; Fatemeh Kheradmand
Journal:  Adv Pharm Bull       Date:  2019-08-01

Review 10.  Personalized treatment for advanced colorectal cancer: KRAS and beyond.

Authors:  Gargi Surendra Patel; Christos S Karapetis
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 3.989

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.