Literature DB >> 17610882

Measurement of hold-up volumes in reverse-phase liquid chromatography Definition and comparison between static and dynamic methods.

Fabrice Gritti1, Yuri Kazakevich, Georges Guiochon.   

Abstract

The hold-up volumes, V(M) of two series of RPLC adsorbents were measured using three different approaches. The first method is based on the difference between the volumes of the empty column tube (150x4.6mm) and of the material packed inside the column. It is considered as giving the correct value of V(M). This method combines the results of the BET characterization of the adsorbent before packing (giving the specific pore volume), of carbon element analysis (giving the mass fraction of silica and alkyl bonded chains), of Helium pycnometry (providing silica density), and of inverse size exclusion chromatography (ISEC) performed on the packed column (yielding the interparticle volume). The second method is static pycnometry, which consists in weighing the masses of the chromatographic column filled with two distinct solvents of different densities. The last method is based on the thermodynamic definition of the hold-up volume and uses the dynamic minor disturbance method (MDM) with binary eluents. The experimental results of these three non-destructive methods are compared. They exhibit significant, systematic differences. Pycnometry underestimates V(M) by a few percent for adsorbents having a high carbon content. The results of the MDM method depend strongly on the choice of the binary solution used and may underestimate or overestimate V(M). The hold-up volume V(M) of the RPLC adsorbents tested is best measured by the MDM method using a mixture of ethanol and water.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17610882     DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2007.05.102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chromatogr A        ISSN: 0021-9673            Impact factor:   4.759


  7 in total

1.  Combining Chemometric Models with Adsorption Isotherm Measurements to Study Omeprazole in RP-LC.

Authors:  Dennis Åsberg; Marek Leśko; Jörgen Samuelsson; Anders Karlsson; Krzysztof Kaczmarski; Torgny Fornstedt
Journal:  Chromatographia       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 2.044

2.  Electron-transfer-initiated benzoin- and Stetter-like reactions in packed-bed reactors for process intensification.

Authors:  Anna Zaghi; Daniele Ragno; Graziano Di Carmine; Carmela De Risi; Olga Bortolini; Pier Paolo Giovannini; Giancarlo Fantin; Alessandro Massi
Journal:  Beilstein J Org Chem       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 2.883

3.  Thermodynamic Insights into the Separation of Carotenoids in Reversed-Phase Liquid Chromatography.

Authors:  Nicola Marchetti; Pier Paolo Giovannini; Martina Catani; Luisa Pasti; Alberto Cavazzini
Journal:  Int J Anal Chem       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 1.885

4.  One-Step Purification of Microbially Produced Hydrophobic Terpenes via Process Chromatography.

Authors:  Ljubomir Grozdev; Johann Kaiser; Sonja Berensmeier
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2019-07-29

5.  Understanding the Working Mechanism of the Novel HKUST-1@BPS Composite Materials as Stationary Phases for Liquid Chromatography.

Authors:  Bulat R Saifutdinov; Vera I Isaeva; Vladimir V Chernyshev; Vadim V Vergun; Gennady I Kapustin; Yulia P Ivanova; Mikhail M Ilyin; Olga P Tkachenko; Aleksey K Buryak; Leonid M Kustov
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 4.329

6.  Impact of the Preparation Procedure on the Performance of the Microporous HKUST-1 Metal-Organic Framework in the Liquid-Phase Separation of Aromatic Compounds.

Authors:  Vera I Isaeva; Bulat R Saifutdinov; Vladimir V Chernyshev; Vadim V Vergun; Gennady I Kapustin; Yulia P Kurnysheva; Mikhail M Ilyin; Leonid M Kustov
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-06-06       Impact factor: 4.411

7.  Buffer Influence on the Amino Acid Silica Interaction.

Authors:  Saientan Bag; Stefan Rauwolf; Mikhail Suyetin; Sebastian P Schwaminger; Wolfgang Wenzel; Sonja Berensmeier
Journal:  Chemphyschem       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 3.102

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.