Literature DB >> 17610770

A consensus-based process to define standard national data elements for a Canadian emergency department information system.

G Innes1, M Murray, E Grafstein.   

Abstract

Canadian hospitals gather few emergency department (ED) data, and most cannot track their case mix, care processes, utilization or outcomes. A standard national ED data set would enhance clinical care, quality improvement and research at a local, regional and national level. The Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians, the National Emergency Nurses Affiliation and l'Association des médecins d'urgence du Québec established a joint working group whose objective was to develop a standard national ED data set that meets the information needs of Canadian EDs. The working group reviewed data elements derived from Australia's Victorian Emergency Minimum Dataset, the US Data Elements for Emergency Department Systems document, the Ontario Hospital Emergency Department Working Group data set and the Canadian Institute for Health Information's National Ambulatory Care Reporting System data set. By consensus, the group defined each element as mandatory, preferred or optional, and modified data definitions to increase their relevance to the ED context. The working group identified 69 mandatory elements, 5 preferred elements and 29 optional elements representing demographic, process, clinical and utilization measures. The Canadian Emergency Department Information System data set is a feasible, relevant ED data set developed by emergency physicians and nurses and tailored to the needs of Canadian EDs. If widely adopted, it represents an important step toward a national ED information system that will enable regional, provincial and national comparisons and enhance clinical care, quality improvement and research applications in both rural and urban settings.

Year:  2001        PMID: 17610770     DOI: 10.1017/s1481803500005777

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CJEM        ISSN: 1481-8035            Impact factor:   2.410


  8 in total

1.  [Quality management in emergency departments: Lack of uniform standards for fact-based controlling].

Authors:  M Ries; M Christ
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 0.840

2.  [National data set "emergency department": development, structure and approval by the Deutsche Interdisziplinäre Vereinigung für Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin].

Authors:  M Kulla; R Röhrig; M Helm; M Bernhard; A Gries; R Lefering; F Walcher
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  Chief complaint-based performance measures: a new focus for acute care quality measurement.

Authors:  Richard T Griffey; Jesse M Pines; Heather L Farley; Michael P Phelan; Christopher Beach; Jeremiah D Schuur; Arjun K Venkatesh
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 5.721

4.  A method for reviewing the accuracy and reliability of a five-level triage process (canadian triage and acuity scale) in a community emergency department setting: building the crowding measurement infrastructure.

Authors:  Michael K Howlett; Paul R T Atkinson
Journal:  Emerg Med Int       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 1.112

5.  Emergency department coding of bicycle and pedestrian injuries during the transition from ICD-9 to ICD-10.

Authors:  M Karkhaneh; B E Hagel; A Couperthwaite; L D Saunders; D C Voaklander; B H Rowe
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 2.399

6.  The way from pen and paper to electronic documentation in a German emergency department.

Authors:  Benjamin Lucas; Peter Schladitz; Wiebke Schirrmeister; Gerald Pliske; Felix Walcher; Martin Kulla; Dominik Brammen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Emergency nurses' triage narrative data, their uses and structure: a scoping review protocol.

Authors:  Christopher Thomas Picard; Manal Kleib; Hannah M O'Rourke; Colleen M Norris; Matthew J Douma
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 3.006

8.  Tracking progress in suicide prevention in Indigenous communities: a challenge for public health surveillance in Canada.

Authors:  Nathaniel J Pollock; Gwen K Healey; Michael Jong; James E Valcour; Shree Mulay
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 3.295

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.