David J Becker1. 1. Department of Health Care Organization and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, RPHB 330, 1530 3rd Avenue South, Birmingham, AL 35294-0022, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of a weekend hospitalization on the timing and incidence of intensive cardiac procedures, and on subsequent expenditures, mortality and readmission rates for Medicare patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). DATA SOURCES: The primary data are longitudinal, administrative claims for 922,074 elderly, non-rural, fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries hospitalized with AMI from 1989 to 1998. Annual patient-level cohorts provide information on ex ante health status, procedure use, expenditures, and health outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: The patient is the primary unit of analysis. I use ordinary least squares regression to estimate the effect of weekend hospitalization on rates of cardiac catheterization, angioplasty, and bypass surgery (in various time periods subsequent to the initial hospitalization), 1-year expenditures and rates of adverse health outcomes in various periods following the AMI admission. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Weekend AMI patients are significantly less likely to receive immediate intensive cardiac procedures, and experience significantly higher rates of adverse health outcomes. Weekend admission leads to a 3.47 percentage point reduction in catheterization at 1 day, a 1.52 point reduction in angioplasty, and a 0.35 point reduction in by-pass surgery (p<.001 in all cases). The primary effect is delayed treatment, as weekend-weekday procedure differentials narrow over time from the initial hospitalization. Weekend patients experience a 0.38 percentage point (p<.001) increase in 1-year mortality and a 0.20 point (p<.001) increase in 1-year readmission with congestive heart failure. CONCLUSIONS: Weekend hospitalization leads to delayed provision of intensive procedures and elevated 1-year mortality for elderly AMI patients. The existence of measurable differences in treatments raises questions regarding the efficacy of a single input regulation (e.g., mandated nurse staffing ratios) in enhancing the quality of weekend care. My results suggest that targeted financial incentives might be a more cost-effective policy response than broad regulation aimed at improving quality.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of a weekend hospitalization on the timing and incidence of intensive cardiac procedures, and on subsequent expenditures, mortality and readmission rates for Medicare patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). DATA SOURCES: The primary data are longitudinal, administrative claims for 922,074 elderly, non-rural, fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries hospitalized with AMI from 1989 to 1998. Annual patient-level cohorts provide information on ex ante health status, procedure use, expenditures, and health outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: The patient is the primary unit of analysis. I use ordinary least squares regression to estimate the effect of weekend hospitalization on rates of cardiac catheterization, angioplasty, and bypass surgery (in various time periods subsequent to the initial hospitalization), 1-year expenditures and rates of adverse health outcomes in various periods following the AMI admission. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Weekend AMI patients are significantly less likely to receive immediate intensive cardiac procedures, and experience significantly higher rates of adverse health outcomes. Weekend admission leads to a 3.47 percentage point reduction in catheterization at 1 day, a 1.52 point reduction in angioplasty, and a 0.35 point reduction in by-pass surgery (p<.001 in all cases). The primary effect is delayed treatment, as weekend-weekday procedure differentials narrow over time from the initial hospitalization. Weekend patients experience a 0.38 percentage point (p<.001) increase in 1-year mortality and a 0.20 point (p<.001) increase in 1-year readmission with congestive heart failure. CONCLUSIONS: Weekend hospitalization leads to delayed provision of intensive procedures and elevated 1-year mortality for elderly AMI patients. The existence of measurable differences in treatments raises questions regarding the efficacy of a single input regulation (e.g., mandated nurse staffing ratios) in enhancing the quality of weekend care. My results suggest that targeted financial incentives might be a more cost-effective policy response than broad regulation aimed at improving quality.
Authors: C L Grines; K F Browne; J Marco; D Rothbaum; G W Stone; J O'Keefe; P Overlie; B Donohue; N Chelliah; G C Timmis Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1993-03-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: J L Rouleau; L A Moyé; M A Pfeffer; J M Arnold; V Bernstein; T E Cuddy; G R Dagenais; E M Geltman; S Goldman; D Gordon Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1993-03-18 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: W Fraser; R H Usher; F H McLean; C Bossenberry; M E Thomson; M S Kramer; L P Smith; H Power Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 1987-02 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Anai N Kothari; Sarah A Brownlee; Robert H Blackwell; Matthew A C Zapf; Talar Markossian; Gopal N Gupta; Paul C Kuo Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2017-06-01 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Evan S Fieldston; Matthew Hall; Samir S Shah; Paul D Hain; Marion R Sills; Anthony D Slonim; Angela L Myers; Courtney Cannon; Susmita Pati Journal: J Hosp Med Date: 2011-05-24 Impact factor: 2.960
Authors: Saul Blecker; Keith Goldfeld; Naeun Park; Daniel Shine; Jonathan S Austrian; R Scott Braithwaite; Martha J Radford; Marc N Gourevitch Journal: Am J Med Date: 2013-12-11 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: Saul Blecker; Keith Goldfeld; Hannah Park; Martha J Radford; Sarah Munson; Fritz Francois; Jonathan S Austrian; R Scott Braithwaite; Katherine Hochman; Richard Donoghue; Bernard A Birnbaum; Marc N Gourevitch Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2015-05-07 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Saul Blecker; Daniel Shine; Naeun Park; Keith Goldfeld; R Scott Braithwaite; Martha J Radford; Marc N Gourevitch Journal: Int J Qual Health Care Date: 2014-07-03 Impact factor: 2.038