Literature DB >> 17610309

A review of clinical upper limb assessments within the framework of the WHO ICF.

Cheryl Metcalf1, Jo Adams, Jane Burridge, Victoria Yule, Paul Chappell.   

Abstract

This paper is intended to provide a practical overview for clinicians and researchers involved in assessing upper limb function. It considers 25 upper limb assessments used in musculoskeletal care and presents a simple, straightforward comparative review of each. The World Health Organization International Classification on Functioning, Disability and Health (WHO ICF) is used to provide a relative summary of purpose between each assessment. Measurement properties of each assessment are provided, considering the type of data generated, availability of reliability estimates and normative data for the assessment. Copyright (c) 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17610309     DOI: 10.1002/msc.108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Musculoskeletal Care        ISSN: 1478-2189


  12 in total

Review 1.  Evaluation of Non Diseased Specified Outcome Measures in Hand Injuries to Assess Activity and Participation Based on ICF Content.

Authors:  Maryam Farzad; Fereydoun Layeghi; Ali Asgari; Seyed Ali Hosseini; Mehdi Rassafiani
Journal:  J Hand Microsurg       Date:  2013-12-25

2.  A comparison of three measures of upper limb function in Friedreich ataxia.

Authors:  L A Corben; G Tai; C Wilson; V Collins; A J Churchyard; M B Delatycki
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2009-10-13       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  Effects of delayed visual feedback on grooved pegboard test performance.

Authors:  Waka Fujisaki
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-03-08

4.  A simple ERP method for quantitative analysis of cognitive workload in myoelectric prosthesis control and human-machine interaction.

Authors:  Sean Deeny; Caitlin Chicoine; Levi Hargrove; Todd Parrish; Arun Jayaraman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Assessing the impact of upper limb disability following stroke: a qualitative enquiry using internet-based personal accounts of stroke survivors.

Authors:  Leon Poltawski; Rhoda Allison; Simon Briscoe; Jennifer Freeman; Cherry Kilbride; Debbie Neal; Ailie J Turton; Sarah Dean
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 3.033

6.  The Reality of Myoelectric Prostheses: Understanding What Makes These Devices Difficult for Some Users to Control.

Authors:  Alix Chadwell; Laurence Kenney; Sibylle Thies; Adam Galpin; John Head
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 2.650

7.  Validation of the shoulder36 for the activities of daily living with shoulder disorders.

Authors:  Satoshi Shimo; Yuta Sakamoto; Takashi Amari; Shota Gemma
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2017-04-20

Review 8.  Wearable technology in stroke rehabilitation: towards improved diagnosis and treatment of upper-limb motor impairment.

Authors:  Pablo Maceira-Elvira; Traian Popa; Anne-Christine Schmid; Friedhelm C Hummel
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 4.262

9.  Assessment of grip strength with the modified sphygmomanometer test: association between upper limb global strength and motor function.

Authors:  Júlia C Martins; Larissa T Aguiar; Eliza M Lara; Luci F Teixeira-Salmela; Christina D C M Faria
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 3.377

10.  Corrigendum: The Reality of Myoelectric Prostheses: Understanding What Makes These Devices Difficult for Some Users to Control.

Authors:  Alix Chadwell; Laurence Kenney; Sibylle Thies; Adam Galpin; John Head
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 2.650

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.