OBJECTIVE: To compare executive, memory and visuospatial functioning of DSM-IV anorexia nervosa (AN), bulimia nervosa (BN), and normal controls (NC). METHOD: A comparison of women involving: (i) 16 AN with body mass indices (BMI) < or = 17.5 kg/m(2); (ii) 12 AN with BMI > 18.5 kg/m(2) for at least 3 months; (iii) 13 BN; and (iv) 16 NC participants was performed with groups of similar age and intelligence. Groups were assessed with EDE-12, MADRS, HAMA, Cognitive Drug Research (CDR) battery, and Bechara tasks. RESULTS: Significant impairments in CDR Power of Attention were present in underweight AN and BN participants. CDR Morse Tapping was significantly impaired in all clinical groups. The BN and weight-recovered AN groups were significantly impaired on CDR immediate word recall. The BN group alone was significantly impaired on CDR delayed word recall. CONCLUSION: Attentional impairment is similar in AN and BN. Impaired motor tasks in AN persist after "weight-recovery" and are similar to impairments in BN. BN may be discriminated from AN on word recall. (c) 2007 by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
OBJECTIVE: To compare executive, memory and visuospatial functioning of DSM-IV anorexia nervosa (AN), bulimia nervosa (BN), and normal controls (NC). METHOD: A comparison of women involving: (i) 16 AN with body mass indices (BMI) < or = 17.5 kg/m(2); (ii) 12 AN with BMI > 18.5 kg/m(2) for at least 3 months; (iii) 13 BN; and (iv) 16 NC participants was performed with groups of similar age and intelligence. Groups were assessed with EDE-12, MADRS, HAMA, Cognitive Drug Research (CDR) battery, and Bechara tasks. RESULTS: Significant impairments in CDR Power of Attention were present in underweight AN and BN participants. CDR Morse Tapping was significantly impaired in all clinical groups. The BN and weight-recovered AN groups were significantly impaired on CDR immediate word recall. The BN group alone was significantly impaired on CDR delayed word recall. CONCLUSION: Attentional impairment is similar in AN and BN. Impaired motor tasks in AN persist after "weight-recovery" and are similar to impairments in BN. BN may be discriminated from AN on word recall. (c) 2007 by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Authors: Megan E Shott; J Vincent Filoteo; Leah M Jappe; Tamara Pryor; W Todd Maddox; Michael D H Rollin; Jennifer O Hagman; Guido K W Frank Journal: Neuropsychology Date: 2011-12-26 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Millie Maxwell; Laura M Thornton; Tammy L Root; Andrea Poyastro Pinheiro; Michael Strober; Harry Brandt; Steve Crawford; Scott Crow; Manfred M Fichter; Katherine A Halmi; Craig Johnson; Allan S Kaplan; Pamela Keel; Kelly L Klump; Maria LaVia; James E Mitchell; Kathy Plotnicov; Alessandro Rotondo; D Blake Woodside; Wade H Berrettini; Walter H Kaye; Cynthia M Bulik Journal: Int J Eat Disord Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 4.861
Authors: Lindsay P Bodell; Pamela K Keel; Michael C Brumm; Ashley Akubuiro; Joseph Caballero; Daniel Tranel; Brendan Hodis; Laurie M McCormick Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2014-06-04 Impact factor: 4.791
Authors: Anna M Bardone-Cone; Megan B Harney; Christine R Maldonado; Melissa A Lawson; D Paul Robinson; Roma Smith; Aneesh Tosh Journal: Behav Res Ther Date: 2009-11-13
Authors: J Cholet; M Rousselet; Y Donnio; M Burlot; M Pere; S Lambert; B Rocher; M Chirio-Espitalier; E Eyzop; M Grall-Bronnec Journal: Eat Weight Disord Date: 2020-08-07 Impact factor: 4.652
Authors: Ana B Fagundo; Rafael de la Torre; Susana Jiménez-Murcia; Zaida Agüera; Roser Granero; Salomé Tárrega; Cristina Botella; Rosa Baños; Jose M Fernández-Real; Roser Rodríguez; Laura Forcano; Gema Frühbeck; Javier Gómez-Ambrosi; Francisco J Tinahones; Jose C Fernández-García; Felipe F Casanueva; Fernando Fernández-Aranda Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-08-21 Impact factor: 3.240