Literature DB >> 17607307

Share and share alike: deciding how to distribute the scientific and social benefits of genomic data.

Morris W Foster1, Richard R Sharp.   

Abstract

Emerging technologies make genomic analyses more efficient and less expensive, enabling genome-wide association and gene-environment interaction studies. In anticipation of their results, funding agencies such as the US National Institutes of Health and the Wellcome Trust are formulating guidelines for sharing the large amounts of genomic data that are generated by the projects that they sponsor. Data-sharing policies can have varying implications for how disease susceptibility and drug-response research will be pursued by the scientific community, and for who will benefit from the resulting medical discoveries. We suggest that the complex interplay of stakeholders and their interests, rather than single-issue and single-stakeholder perspectives, should be considered when deciding genomic data-sharing policies.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17607307     DOI: 10.1038/nrg2124

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Rev Genet        ISSN: 1471-0056            Impact factor:   53.242


  19 in total

1.  Public perspectives regarding data-sharing practices in genomics research.

Authors:  S B Haga; J O'Daniel
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 2.000

2.  Public and biobank participant attitudes toward genetic research participation and data sharing.

Authors:  A A Lemke; W A Wolf; J Hebert-Beirne; M E Smith
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 2.000

3.  The National Cancer Institute's Community Networks Program Initiative to Reduce Cancer Health Disparities: Outcomes and Lessons Learned.

Authors:  Kathryn L Braun; Susan Stewart; Claudia Baquet; Lisa Berry-Bobovski; Daniel Blumenthal; Heather M Brandt; Dedra S Buchwald; Janis E Campbell; Kathryn Coe; Leslie C Cooper; Paula Espinoza; Ronda Henry-Tillman; Margaret Hargreaves; Aimee James; Judith Salmon Kaur; K Viswanath; Grace X Ma; Jeanne Mandelblatt; Cathy Meade; Amelie Ramirez; Isabel Scarinci; Sora Park Tanjasiri; Beti Thompson; Anissa I Vines; Mark Dignan
Journal:  Prog Community Health Partnersh       Date:  2015

4.  Complex diseases, complex genes: keeping pathways on the right track.

Authors:  Peter Kraft; Soumya Raychaudhuri
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.822

Review 5.  Data sharing in genomics--re-shaping scientific practice.

Authors:  Jane Kaye; Catherine Heeney; Naomi Hawkins; Jantina de Vries; Paula Boddington
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 53.242

6.  Who shares? Who doesn't? Factors associated with openly archiving raw research data.

Authors:  Heather A Piwowar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Ethical issues in human genomics research in developing countries.

Authors:  Jantina de Vries; Susan J Bull; Ogobara Doumbo; Muntaser Ibrahim; Odile Mercereau-Puijalon; Dominic Kwiatkowski; Michael Parker
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 2.652

8.  Data sharing in the post-genomic world: the experience of the International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC) Data Access Compliance Office (DACO).

Authors:  Yann Joly; Edward S Dove; Bartha M Knoppers; Martin Bobrow; Don Chalmers
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Ethical data release in genome-wide association studies in developing countries.

Authors:  Michael Parker; Susan J Bull; Jantina de Vries; Tsiri Agbenyega; Ogobara K Doumbo; Dominic P Kwiatkowski
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 11.069

10.  Towards a data sharing culture: recommendations for leadership from academic health centers.

Authors:  Heather A Piwowar; Michael J Becich; Howard Bilofsky; Rebecca S Crowley
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2008-09-02       Impact factor: 11.069

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.