STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective database review of all traumatic cervical spine injuries at a single tertiary care center. OBJECTIVE: To determine the acute survival of patients aged 65 and over with a variety of cervical spine injuries, regardless of operative or conservative treatment. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Elderly patients with cervical spine injuries have historically suffered from high mortality rates. More recent literature has demonstrated improved outcomes among operatively treated elderly, but has suggested that the nonoperative treatment of cervical injuries in this population may itself contribute to increased mortality rates. METHODS: One thousand seventy-three consecutive patients were identified and initial hospitalization records reviewed. Ninety-four patients were excluded for incomplete data. The remaining 979 patients were divided by age into young and elderly groups. Sex distribution, mechanism, injury type, comorbidities, and mortality and complication rates were compared. Elderly patients were further divided into operative and nonoperative groups and acute outcomes were compared. RESULTS: The overall acute mortality rate for all patients with cervical spine injuries was 5.92%. Eighty-six percent of all patients 65 and over survived, as did 96.1% of younger patients. Seventy-three percent of elderly patients with complete injuries survived, as did 80% of those with incomplete injuries, and 95.6% of intact elderly. Acute mortality rates were statistically comparable in both the operatively and nonoperatively treated groups of elderly. CONCLUSIONS: In this large comprehensive series of elderly patients with cervical spine injuries, statistically comparable survival rates were achieved in both operatively treated and nonoperatively treated patient populations. This finding challenges the conclusion that the nonoperative treatment of the elderly necessarily results in increased acute mortality.
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective database review of all traumatic cervical spine injuries at a single tertiary care center. OBJECTIVE: To determine the acute survival of patients aged 65 and over with a variety of cervical spine injuries, regardless of operative or conservative treatment. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Elderly patients with cervical spine injuries have historically suffered from high mortality rates. More recent literature has demonstrated improved outcomes among operatively treated elderly, but has suggested that the nonoperative treatment of cervical injuries in this population may itself contribute to increased mortality rates. METHODS: One thousand seventy-three consecutive patients were identified and initial hospitalization records reviewed. Ninety-four patients were excluded for incomplete data. The remaining 979 patients were divided by age into young and elderly groups. Sex distribution, mechanism, injury type, comorbidities, and mortality and complication rates were compared. Elderly patients were further divided into operative and nonoperative groups and acute outcomes were compared. RESULTS: The overall acute mortality rate for all patients with cervical spine injuries was 5.92%. Eighty-six percent of all patients 65 and over survived, as did 96.1% of younger patients. Seventy-three percent of elderly patients with complete injuries survived, as did 80% of those with incomplete injuries, and 95.6% of intact elderly. Acute mortality rates were statistically comparable in both the operatively and nonoperatively treated groups of elderly. CONCLUSIONS: In this large comprehensive series of elderly patients with cervical spine injuries, statistically comparable survival rates were achieved in both operatively treated and nonoperatively treated patient populations. This finding challenges the conclusion that the nonoperative treatment of the elderly necessarily results in increased acute mortality.
Authors: Christian Blex; Martin Kreutzträger; Johanna Ludwig; Claus Peter Nowak; Jan M Schwab; Tom Lübstorf; Axel Ekkernkamp; Marcel A Kopp; Thomas Liebscher Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-07-06 Impact factor: 4.996
Authors: Mark J Sokolowski; Adrian P Jackson; Michael H Haak; Paul R Meyer; Margaret Szewczyk Sokolowski Journal: J Spinal Cord Med Date: 2007 Impact factor: 1.985