Literature DB >> 17606959

Life support for patients without a surrogate decision maker: who decides?

Douglas B White1, J Randall Curtis, Leslie E Wolf, Thomas J Prendergast, Darren B Taichman, Gary Kuniyoshi, Frank Acerra, Bernard Lo, John M Luce.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Physicians in intensive care units have withdrawn life support in incapacitated patients who lack surrogate decision makers and advance directives, yet little is known about how often this occurs or under what circumstances.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the proportion of deaths in intensive care units that occur in patients who lack decision-making capacity and a surrogate and the process that physicians use to make these decisions.
DESIGN: Multicenter, prospective cohort study.
SETTING: Intensive care units of 7 medical centers in 2004 to 2005. PATIENTS: 3011 consecutive critically ill adults. MEASUREMENTS: Attending physicians completed a questionnaire about the decision-making process for each incapacitated patient without a surrogate or advance directive for whom they considered limiting life support.
RESULTS: Overall, 5.5% (25 of 451 patients) of deaths in intensive care units occurred in incapacitated patients who lacked a surrogate decision maker and an advance directive. This percentage ranged from 0% to 27% across the 7 centers. Physicians considered limiting life support in 37 such patients or would have considered it if a surrogate had been available. In 6 patients, there was prospective hospital review of the decision, and in 1 patient, there was court review. In the remaining 30 patients, the decision was made by the intensive care unit team alone or by the intensive care unit team plus another attending physician. The authors found wide variability in hospital policies, professional society guidelines, and state laws regarding who should make life-support decisions for this patient population. Thirty-six of 37 life-support decisions were made in a manner inconsistent with American College of Physicians guidelines for judicial review. LIMITATIONS: The results are based on physicians' self-reported practices and may not match actual practices. The number of incapacitated patients without surrogates in the study is small.
CONCLUSIONS: Incapacitated patients without surrogates accounted for approximately 1 in 20 deaths in intensive care units. Most life-support decisions were made by physicians without institutional or judicial review.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17606959     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-1-200707030-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  30 in total

Review 1.  The Unbefriended Patient: An Exercise in Ethical Clinical Reasoning.

Authors:  Denise M Connor; G David Elkin; Kewchang Lee; Vanessa Thompson; Heather Whelan
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Ethical Concerns and Procedural Pathways for Patients Who are Incapacitated and Alone: Implications from a Qualitative Study for Advancing Ethical Practice.

Authors:  Jennifer Moye; Casey Catlin; Jennifer Kwak; Erica Wood; Pamela B Teaster
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2017-06

3.  The Role of a Hospital Ethics Consultation Service in Decision-Making for Unrepresented Patients.

Authors:  Andrew M Courtwright; Joshua Abrams; Ellen M Robinson
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 1.352

4.  Using family satisfaction data to improve the processes of care in ICU.

Authors:  Jennifer Kryworuchko; Daren K Heyland
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 5.  Global variability in withholding and withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment in the intensive care unit: a systematic review.

Authors:  N M Mark; S G Rayner; N J Lee; J R Curtis
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Can the Communion of Saints Help the Search for Justice in Dying well (Enough), "In Abraham's Arms, Where Lazarus is Poor no Longer"?

Authors:  William Joseph Buckley
Journal:  Linacre Q       Date:  2013-11-01

7.  The POLST paradigm and form:Facts and analysis.

Authors:  Christian Brugger; Louis C Breschi; Edith Mary Hart; Mark Kummer; John I Lane; Peter T Morrow; Franklin L Smith; William L Toffler; Marisa Beffel; John F Brehany; Sara Buscher; Rita L Marker
Journal:  Linacre Q       Date:  2013-05

8.  Intensive care unit strain should not rush physicians into making inappropriate decisions, but merely reduce the time to the right decisions being made.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Quenot; Fiona Ecarnot; Nicolas Meunier-Beillard; Auguste Dargent; Audrey Large; Pascal Andreu; Jean-Philippe Rigaud
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-08

9.  Ethical Challenges in Caring for Unrepresented Adults: A Qualitative Study of Key Stakeholders.

Authors:  Aradhana Verma; Alexander K Smith; Krista L Harrison; Anna H Chodos
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 5.562

10.  Guardianship and End-of-Life Decision Making.

Authors:  Andrew B Cohen; Megan S Wright; Leo Cooney; Terri Fried
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 21.873

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.