Literature DB >> 1760685

Recurrence of colorectal cancer after sutured and stapled large bowel anastomoses.

A M Akyol1, J R McGregor, D J Galloway, G Murray, W D George.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare surgical stapling and manual suturing techniques with respect to the incidence of tumour recurrence in patients with colorectal cancer: 294 patients undergoing potentially curative resections for colorectal cancer were randomly allocated to receive sutured (n = 142) or stapled (n = 152) anastomoses. The mean (s.e.m.) incidence of tumour recurrence at the end of 24 months was 29.4(4.4) per cent in the sutured group, compared with 19.1(3.9) per cent in the stapled group (P less than 0.05). The corresponding rates for cancer-specific mortality at 24 months were 22.3(4.1) per cent and 10.9(3.0) per cent respectively (P less than 0.01). A multiple regression analysis revealed that the influence of anastomotic technique on recurrence and mortality rate was independent of tumour stage. These results suggest that in colorectal cancer surgery the use of stapling instruments for anastomotic construction could be associated with a reduction in the incidence of recurrence and mortality rate by as much as 50 per cent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1760685     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800781107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  7 in total

Review 1.  Personalized surgery for rectal tumours: the patient's opinion counts.

Authors:  R A Audisio; A Filiberti; J G Geraghty; B Andreoni
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Higher frequency of anastomotic leakage with stapled compared to hand-sewn ileocolic anastomosis in a large population-based study.

Authors:  Pontus Gustafsson; Pia Jestin; Ulf Gunnarsson; Ulrik Lindforss
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Comparison of hand-sewn and stapled esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal resection for cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  S Law; M Fok; K M Chu; J Wong
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Compression anastomoses in colon and rectal surgery with the NiTi ColonRing™.

Authors:  C Avgoustou; P Penlidis; A Tsakpini; C Sioros; D Giannousis
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2011-12-03       Impact factor: 3.781

5.  Renewed assessment of the stapled anastomosis with the increasing role of laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  Ramzi Amri; Liliana G Bordeianou; Patricia Sylla; David L Berger
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Anastomotic leaks in colorectal cancer surgery: a risk factor for recurrence?

Authors:  A M Akyol; J R McGregor; D J Galloway; G D Murray; W D George
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 7.  Perioperative host-tumor inflammatory interactions: a potential trigger for disease recurrence following a curative resection for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Chikao Miki; Kouji Tanaka; Yasuhiro Inoue; Toshimitsu Araki; Masaki Ohi; Yasuhiko Mohri; Keiichi Uchida; Masato Kusunoki
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 2.549

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.