Literature DB >> 17606464

Rheumatoid arthritis bone erosion volumes on CT and MRI: reliability and correlations with erosion scores on CT, MRI and radiography.

Uffe Møller Døhn1, Bo J Ejbjerg, Maria Hasselquist, Eva Narvestad, Michel Court-Payen, Marcin Szkudlarek, Jakob Møller, Henrik S Thomsen, Mikkel Ostergaard.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate intramodality and intermodality agreements of CT and MRI erosion volumes in metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and to compare the volumes with erosion scores for CT, MRI and radiography.
METHODS: In total, 17 patients with RA and four healthy controls underwent unilateral CT, MRI and radiography of second to fifth MCP joints in one hand. Erosion volumes (using OSIRIS software) and scores were determined from CT, MRI and radiography (scores only).
RESULTS: CT, MRI and radiography detected 77, 62 and 12 erosions, respectively. On CT, the mean erosion volume was 26 mm(3) (median 10; range 0 to 248) and 30 mm(3) (18; 1 to 163) on MRI. Total erosion volumes (per patient/control) were 97 mm(3) (29; 0 to 485) on CT and 90 mm(3) (46; 0 to 389) on MRI. For volumes, Spearman correlation coefficients were 0.96 to 0.99 (CT vs CT), 0.95 to 0.98 (MRI vs MRI) and 0.64 to 0.89 (CT vs MRI), all p<0.01. MRI erosion volumes correlated with the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials/Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (OMERACT RAMRIS) erosion scores (0.91 to 0.99; p<0.01) and the Sharp/van der Heijde erosion score (0.49 to 0.63; p<0.01).
CONCLUSION: Very high intramodality and high intermodality agreements of CT and MRI erosion volumes were found, encouraging further testing in longitudinal studies. A close correlation with CT and MRI erosion volumes supports the OMERACT RAMRIS erosion score as a valid measure of joint destruction in RA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17606464      PMCID: PMC1994287          DOI: 10.1136/ard.2007.072520

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis        ISSN: 0003-4967            Impact factor:   19.103


  15 in total

1.  How to read radiographs according to the Sharp/van der Heijde method.

Authors:  D van der Heijde
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.666

2.  Computerized measurement of magnetic resonance imaging erosion volumes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison with existing magnetic resonance imaging scoring systems and standard clinical outcome measures.

Authors:  Paul Bird; Marissa Lassere; Ron Shnier; John Edmonds
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2003-03

Review 3.  Magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of bone damage in rheumatoid arthritis: a more precise image or just a more expensive one?

Authors:  Raphaela Goldbach-Mansky; James Woodburn; Lawrence Yao; Peter E Lipsky
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2003-03

4.  The EULAR-OMERACT rheumatoid arthritis MRI reference image atlas: the metacarpophalangeal joints.

Authors:  P Conaghan; P Bird; B Ejbjerg; P O'Connor; C Peterfy; F McQueen; M Lassere; P Emery; R Shnier; J Edmonds; M Østergaard
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 19.103

5.  Reliability and sensitivity to change of the OMERACT rheumatoid arthritis magnetic resonance imaging score in a multireader, longitudinal setting.

Authors:  Espen A Haavardsholm; Mikkel Ostergaard; Bo J Ejbjerg; Nils P Kvan; Till A Uhlig; Finn G Lilleås; Tore K Kvien
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2005-12

6.  Arthritis of the finger joints: a comprehensive approach comparing conventional radiography, scintigraphy, ultrasound, and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  M Backhaus; T Kamradt; D Sandrock; D Loreck; J Fritz; K J Wolf; H Raber; B Hamm; G R Burmester; M Bollow
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1999-06

7.  Detection of erosions in the rheumatoid hand; a comparative study of multidetector computerized tomography versus magnetic resonance scanning.

Authors:  David Perry; Neal Stewart; Nick Benton; Elizabeth Robinson; Sue Yeoman; Jeff Crabbe; Fiona McQueen
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.666

8.  OMERACT Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Studies. Exercise 3: an international multicenter reliability study using the RA-MRI Score.

Authors:  Marissa Lassere; Fiona McQueen; Mikkel Østergaard; Philip Conaghan; Ron Shnier; Charles Peterfy; Mette Klarlund; Paul Bird; Philip O'Connor; Neal Stewart; Paul Emery; Harry Genant; John Edmonds
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.666

9.  Are bone erosions detected by magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography true erosions? A comparison with computed tomography in rheumatoid arthritis metacarpophalangeal joints.

Authors:  Uffe Møller Døhn; Bo J Ejbjerg; Michel Court-Payen; Maria Hasselquist; Eva Narvestad; Marcin Szkudlarek; Jakob M Møller; Henrik S Thomsen; Mikkel Østergaard
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.156

10.  Conventional radiography requires a MRI-estimated bone volume loss of 20% to 30% to allow certain detection of bone erosions in rheumatoid arthritis metacarpophalangeal joints.

Authors:  Bo Jannik Ejbjerg; Aage Vestergaard; Søren Jacobsen; Henrik Thomsen; Mikkel Østergaard
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 5.156

View more
  23 in total

Review 1.  Imaging in rheumatoid arthritis: the role of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography.

Authors:  Mikkel Østergaard; Mikael Boesen
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Current imaging strategies in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Merissa N Zeman; Peter Jh Scott
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-03-28

Review 3.  Synovial and inflammatory diseases in childhood: role of new imaging modalities in the assessment of patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

Authors:  Maria Beatrice Damasio; Clara Malattia; Alberto Martini; Paolo Tomà
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2010-04-30

4.  Diagnostic value of high-frequency ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in early rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Ming-Yu Wang; Xian-Bin Wang; Xue-Hui Sun; Feng-Li Liu; Sheng-Chuan Huang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 5.  Insights into rheumatoid arthritis from use of MRI.

Authors:  Fiona M McQueen; Estee Chan
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.592

6.  Inflammatory focal bone destruction in femoral heads with end-stage haemophilic arthropathy: a study on clinic samples with micro-CT and histological analyses.

Authors:  S Zhang; C Lu; J Ying; P Wang; T Xu; D Chen; H Jin; P Tong
Journal:  Haemophilia       Date:  2015-09-20       Impact factor: 4.287

Review 7.  [High-resolution peripheral quantitative CT (HR-pQCT). New insights into arthritis].

Authors:  S Finzel; J Rech; A Kleyer
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.372

8.  Methods of assessment of tophus and bone erosions in gout using dual-energy CT: reproducibility analysis.

Authors:  Dan Shi; Jian-Xia Xu; Hua-Xiang Wu; Ying Wang; Qi-Jing Zhou; Ri-Sheng Yu
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 9.  Bone erosion in rheumatoid arthritis: mechanisms, diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Georg Schett; Ellen Gravallese
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 20.543

Review 10.  Diagnostic test accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound for detecting bone erosion in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Haozheng Tang; Xinhua Qu; Bing Yue
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 2.980

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.