Literature DB >> 17606315

Cost-effectiveness of HPV 16, 18 vaccination in Brazil.

Sue J Goldie1, Jane J Kim, Katie Kobus, Jeremy D Goldhaber-Fiebert, Joshua Salomon, Meredith K H O'shea, F Xavier Bosch, Silvia de Sanjosé, Eduardo L Franco.   

Abstract

We use an empirically calibrated model to estimate the cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer prevention in Brazil, a country with a high cervical cancer burden. Assuming 70% coverage, HPV 16, 18 vaccination of adolescent girls is expected to reduce the lifetime risk of cancer by approximately 42.7% (range, 33.2-53.5%); screening three times per lifetime is expected to reduce risk by 21.9-30.7% depending on the screening test, and a combined approach of vaccination and screening is expected to reduce cancer risk by a mean of 60.8% (range, 52.8-70.1%). In Brazil; provided the cost per vaccinated woman is less than I$ 25, implying a per dose cost of approximately I$ 5, vaccination before age 12, followed by screening three times per lifetime between ages 35 and 45, would be considered very cost-effective using the country's per capita gross domestic product as a cost-effectiveness threshold. Assuming a coverage rate of 70%, this strategy would be expected to prevent approximately 100,000 cases of invasive cervical cancer over a 5-year period. Vaccination strategies identified as cost-effective may be unaffordable in countries with similar socioeconomic profiles as Brazil without assistance; these results can provide guidance to the global community by identifying health investments of highest priority and with the greatest promise.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17606315     DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.05.058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  47 in total

1.  Forecasting the economic value of an Enterovirus 71 (EV71) vaccine.

Authors:  Bruce Y Lee; Angela R Wateska; Rachel R Bailey; Julie H Y Tai; Kristina M Bacon; Kenneth J Smith
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2010-10-16       Impact factor: 3.641

2.  Calibrating models in economic evaluation: a seven-step approach.

Authors:  Tazio Vanni; Jonathan Karnon; Jason Madan; Richard G White; W John Edmunds; Anna M Foss; Rosa Legood
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  Cost-effectiveness analyses of vaccination programmes : a focused review of modelling approaches.

Authors:  Sun-Young Kim; Sue J Goldie
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  Extending the Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Programme to Include Males in High-Income Countries: A Systematic Review of the Cost-Effectiveness Studies.

Authors:  Mohamed-Béchir Ben Hadj Yahia; Anaïs Jouin-Bortolotti; Benoît Dervaux
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 5.  New technologies for cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  Alaina J Brown; Cornelia L Trimble
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 5.237

6.  Prevalence, distribution and correlates of endocervical human papillomavirus types in Brazilian women.

Authors:  S A Lippman; M C A Sucupira; H E Jones; C G Luppi; J Palefsky; J H H M van de Wijgert; R L S Oliveira; R S Diaz
Journal:  Int J STD AIDS       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.359

7.  How protective is cervical cancer screening against cervical cancer mortality in developing countries? The Colombian case.

Authors:  Luz Angela Chocontá-Piraquive; Nelson Alvis-Guzman; Fernando De la Hoz-Restrepo
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  An updated natural history model of cervical cancer: derivation of model parameters.

Authors:  Nicole G Campos; Emily A Burger; Stephen Sy; Monisha Sharma; Mark Schiffman; Ana Cecilia Rodriguez; Allan Hildesheim; Rolando Herrero; Jane J Kim
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  A cost-utility analysis of cervical cancer vaccination in preadolescent Canadian females.

Authors:  Andrea M Anonychuk; Chris T Bauch; Maraki Fikre Merid; Georges Van Kriekinge; Nadia Demarteau
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-10-31       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Cost effectiveness analysis of including boys in a human papillomavirus vaccination programme in the United States.

Authors:  Jane J Kim; Sue J Goldie
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-10-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.