Literature DB >> 17606178

Survey among 78 studies showed that Lasagna's law holds in Dutch primary care research.

Johannes C van der Wouden1, Annette H Blankenstein, Marcus J H Huibers, Danielle A W M van der Windt, Wim A B Stalman, Arianne P Verhagen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Research in general practice has grown considerably over the past decades, but many projects face problems when recruiting patients. Lasagna's Law states that medical investigators overestimate the number of patients available for a research study. We aimed to assess factors related to success or failure of recruitment in general practice research. STUDY DESIGN AND
SETTING: Survey among investigators involved in primary care research in The Netherlands. Face-to-face interviews were held with investigators of 78 projects, assessing study design and fieldwork characteristics as well as success of patient recruitment.
RESULTS: Studies that focused on prevalent cases were more successful than studies that required incident cases. Studies in which the general practitioner (GP) had to be alert during consultations were less successful. When the GP or practice assistant was the first to inform the patient about the study, patient recruitment was less successful than when the patient received a letter by mail. There was a strong association among these three factors.
CONCLUSION: Lasagna's Law also holds in Dutch primary care research: many studies face recruitment problems. Awareness of study characteristics affecting participation of GPs and patients may help investigators to improve their study design.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17606178     DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.11.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  50 in total

1.  Person-centric clinical trials: defining the N-of-1 clinical trial utilizing a practice-based translational network.

Authors:  Frederick A Curro; Dennis A Robbins; Frederick Naftolin; Ashley C Grill; Don Vena; Louis Terracio
Journal:  Clin Investig (Lond)       Date:  2015

2.  A randomised controlled trial on the effectiveness of bracing patients with idiopathic scoliosis: failure to include patients and lessons to be learnt.

Authors:  Eveline M Bunge; J Dik F Habbema; Harry J de Koning
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Modeling and validating Bayesian accrual models on clinical data and simulations using adaptive priors.

Authors:  Yu Jiang; Steve Simon; Matthew S Mayo; Byron J Gajewski
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  A proactive approach to migraine in primary care: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Antonia F H Smelt; Jeanet W Blom; Frans Dekker; M Elske van den Akker; Arie Knuistingh Neven; Frans G Zitman; Michel D Ferrari; Pim Assendelft
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Strategies for improving patient recruitment to focus groups in primary care: a case study reflective paper using an analytical framework.

Authors:  Jane V Dyas; Tanefa Apekey; Michelle Tilling; A Niroshan Siriwardena
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 4.615

6.  Adequate use of asthma inhalation medication in children: more involvement of the parents seems useful.

Authors:  Johannes H J M Uijen; Yannick J W van Uijthoven; Johannes C van der Wouden; Patrick J E Bindels
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2009-07-13

7.  IMproving PArticipation of patients in Clinical Trials--rationale and design of IMPACT.

Authors:  Katrien Oude Rengerink; Brent C Opmeer; Sabine L M Logtenberg; Lotty Hooft; Kitty W M Bloemenkamp; Monique C Haak; Martijn A Oudijk; Marc E Spaanderman; Johannes J Duvekot; Christine Willekes; Maria G van Pampus; Martina M Porath; Jim van Eyck; Marko J Sikkema; Ben Willem J Mol
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 4.615

8.  A novel evaluation of optimality for randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Jo Wick; Scott M Berry; Hung-Wen Yeh; Won Choi; Christina M Pacheco; Christine Daley; Byron J Gajewski
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 1.051

9.  Preliminary results, methodological considerations and recruitment difficulties of a randomised clinical trial comparing two treatment regimens for patients with headache and neck pain.

Authors:  Willem De Hertogh; Peter Vaes; Dirk Devroey; Paul Louis; Hans Carpay; Steven Truijen; William Duquet; Rob Oostendorp
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Randomised controlled trial of local corticosteroid injections for de Quervain's tenosynovitis in general practice.

Authors:  Cyriac Peters-Veluthamaningal; Jan C Winters; Klaas H Groenier; Betty Meyboom-DeJong
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2009-10-27       Impact factor: 2.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.