Literature DB >> 17605897

International Society for Medical Publication Professionals (ISMPP) position statement: the role of the professional medical writer.

Robert Norris1, Aly Bowman, Jean M Fagan, Eileen R Gallagher, Anna B Geraci, Art Gertel, Laurence Hirsch, Philip D Ross, Thomas P Stossel, Keith Veitch, David Woods.   

Abstract

The International Society for Medical Publication Professionals (ISMPP) is an independent, nonprofit professional association with members from the pharmaceutical, medical device, and biotechnology industries; publication planning and medical communications companies; academia; and medical journal staffs, including editors and publishers. ISMPP's mission is to support the educational needs of medical publication professionals by providing a forum to facilitate awareness and development of best practices in publication planning and implementation, and fostering consensus policies related to medical publishing. This position statement reflects our concern about the current climate of mistrust regarding the use of professional medical writers in the preparation of manuscripts. We acknowledge the skills and training of medical writing professionals and support their role in working with research teams to develop clear and concise manuscripts in a timely fashion. Further, we support complete and transparent disclosure of the role of the medical writer and the source of funding for the writing initiative in order to build awareness of, and trust in, the appropriate use of medical writing professionals. ISMPP endorses use of the contributorship model, which offers detailed information on the roles of all who participated in planning, conducting, developing, and publishing medical research. Further, we propose that this model be integrated into the standard operating procedures of the diverse organizations that comprise our membership because the responsibility for authorship disclosure is shared by sponsors, authors, study investigators, and medical writers. Finally, we commend the many organizations that have worked to increase recognition and understanding of the legitimate role of the medical writer, and are eager to work in concert with them to ensure the rigorous maintenance of all ethical standards for reporting the results of medical research.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17605897     DOI: 10.1185/030079907X210642

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin        ISSN: 0300-7995            Impact factor:   2.580


  6 in total

1.  The need for a transparent, ethical, and successful relationship between academic scientists and the pharmaceutical industry: a view of the Group for the Respect of Ethics and Excellence in Science (GREES).

Authors:  O Bruyere; J A Kanis; M-E Ibar-Abadie; N Alsayed; M L Brandi; N Burlet; D L Cahall; A Chines; J-P Devogelaer; W Dere; N Goel; N Hughes; J-M Kaufman; S Korte; B H Mitlak; D Niese; R Rizzoli; L C Rovati; J-Y Reginster
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Ten recommendations for closing the credibility gap in reporting industry-sponsored clinical research: a joint journal and pharmaceutical industry perspective.

Authors:  Bernadette A Mansi; Juli Clark; Frank S David; Thomas M Gesell; Susan Glasser; John Gonzalez; Daniel G Haller; Christine Laine; Charles L Miller; LaVerne A Mooney; Maja Zecevic
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 7.616

3.  Professional medical writing support and the quality of randomised controlled trial reporting: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  William T Gattrell; Sally Hopewell; Kate Young; Paul Farrow; Richard White; Elizabeth Wager; Christopher C Winchester
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-02-21       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  What should be done to tackle ghostwriting in the medical literature?

Authors:  Peter C Gøtzsche; Jerome P Kassirer; Karen L Woolley; Elizabeth Wager; Adam Jacobs; Art Gertel; Cindy Hamilton
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 11.069

5.  Awareness and enforcement of guidelines for publishing industry-sponsored medical research among publication professionals: the Global Publication Survey.

Authors:  Elizabeth Wager; Karen Woolley; Viv Adshead; Angela Cairns; Josh Fullam; John Gonzalez; Tom Grant; Stephanie Tortell
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-04-19       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Publication ethics from the ground up.

Authors:  Lisa DeTora; Cate Foster; Mukund Nori; Donna Simcoe; Catherine Skobe; Dikran Toroser
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 2.503

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.