Literature DB >> 17605544

Demand-withdraw communication in severely distressed, moderately distressed, and nondistressed couples: rigidity and polarity during relationship and personal problem discussions.

Kathleen A Eldridge1, Mia Sevier, Janice Jones, David C Atkins, Andrew Christensen.   

Abstract

This study investigated demand-withdraw communication among 68 severely distressed couples seeking therapy, 66 moderately distressed couples seeking therapy, and 48 nondistressed couples. Self-report and videotaped discussions replicated previous research, demonstrating that greater demand-withdraw during relationship problem discussions was associated with greater distress and that overall, wife-demand/husband-withdraw was greater than husband-demand/wife-withdraw. Results extended the conflict structure view of demand-withdraw by indicating that this gender polarity in demand-withdraw roles varied in strength and direction depending on who chose the topic for discussion, distress level, and marriage length. Further, in videotaped personal problem discussions, typical gender patterns of demand-withdraw were reversed. Across the relationship and personal problem discussions, a pattern of gender polarity emerged when husbands held the burden of changing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17605544     DOI: 10.1037/0893-3200.21.2.218

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fam Psychol        ISSN: 0893-3200


  14 in total

1.  Exploring the basis for gender differences in the demand-withdraw pattern.

Authors:  Sarah R Holley; Virginia E Sturm; Robert W Levenson
Journal:  J Homosex       Date:  2010

2.  Research on Marital Satisfaction and Stability in the 2010s: Challenging Conventional Wisdom.

Authors:  Benjamin R Karney; Thomas N Bradbury
Journal:  J Marriage Fam       Date:  2020-01-05

3.  Observed communication in couples two years after integrative and traditional behavioral couple therapy: outcome and link with five-year follow-up.

Authors:  Katherine J W Baucom; Mia Sevier; Kathleen A Eldridge; Brian D Doss; Andrew Christensen
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2011-10

4.  Do the naïve know best? The predictive power of naïve ratings of couple interactions.

Authors:  Katherine J W Baucom; Brian R Baucom; Andrew Christensen
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2012-06-18

5.  Demand-Withdraw Patterns in Marital Conflict in the Home.

Authors:  Lauren M Papp; Chrystyna D Kouros; E Mark Cummings
Journal:  Pers Relatsh       Date:  2009-06

6.  Changes in Marital and Partner Relationships in the Aftermath of Hurricane Katrina: An Analysis With Low-Income Women.

Authors:  Sarah R Lowe; Jean E Rhodes; Arielle A J Scoglio
Journal:  Psychol Women Q       Date:  2012-02-02

7.  Conflict and collaboration in middle-aged and older couples: I. Age differences in agency and communion during marital interaction.

Authors:  Timothy W Smith; Cynthia A Berg; Paul Florsheim; Bert N Uchino; Gale Pearce; Melissa Hawkins; Nancy J M Henry; Ryan M Beveridge; Michelle A Skinner; Chrisanna Olsen-Cerny
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2009-06

8.  Time Spent Together in Intimate Relationships: Implications for Relationship Functioning.

Authors:  Jasara N Hogan; Alexander O Crenshaw; Katherine J W Baucom; Brian R W Baucom
Journal:  Contemp Fam Ther       Date:  2021-01-25

9.  Age-Related Changes in Demand-Withdraw Communication Behaviors.

Authors:  Sarah R Holley; Claudia M Haase; Robert W Levenson
Journal:  J Marriage Fam       Date:  2013-08

10.  A replication and extension of the interpersonal process model of demand/withdraw behavior: Incorporating subjective emotional experience.

Authors:  Karena Leo; Alexander O Crenshaw; Jasara N Hogan; Stacia V Bourne; Katherine J W Baucom; Brian R W Baucom
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2020-09-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.