Literature DB >> 17605477

Shear bond strength comparison between two orthodontic adhesives and self-ligating and conventional brackets.

Rodney G Northrup1, David W Berzins, Thomas Gerard Bradley, William Schuckit.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare the shear bond strengths of two adhesives using two types of brackets: a conventional and a self-ligating bracket system.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty extracted human premolars were collected. The premolars were randomly divided into three groups of 20 teeth. All three groups were direct bonded. Groups 1 and 2 used light-cured adhesive and primer (Transbond XT) with a conventional (Orthos) and a self-ligating bracket (Damon 2), respectively. Group 3 used a light-cured primer (Orthosolo) and a light-cured adhesive (Blūgloo) with a self-ligating bracket (Damon 2). The specimens were stored in distilled water at 37 degrees C for 40 +/- 2 hours, after which they were debonded and inspected for Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI) scoring.
RESULTS: The mean shear bond strength was 15.2 MPa for group 1, 23.2 MPa for group 2, and 24.8 MPa for group 3. A one-way analysis of variance and post hoc Tukey test showed significant differences in bond strength (P < .001) between group 1 and groups 2 and 3 but no significant difference (P > .05) between groups 2 and 3. A Weibull analysis demonstrated that all three groups provided sufficient bond strength with over 90% survival rate at normal masticatory and orthodontic force levels. A Kruskal-Wallis test showed no significant difference (P > .05) in ARI scores among all three groups.
CONCLUSIONS: All three groups demonstrated clinically acceptable bond strength. The Damon 2 self-ligating bracket exhibited satisfactory in vitro bond strength with both adhesive systems used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17605477     DOI: 10.2319/022406-79

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  8 in total

1.  Reconditioning of self-ligating brackets.

Authors:  Maria Francesca Sfondrini; Esmeralda Xheka; Andrea Scribante; Paola Gandini; Giuseppe Sfondrini
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Does the Seating Force Affect the Shear Bond Strength of Brackets? An InVitro Study.

Authors:  Oral Sökücü; Seher Yeşildal; Rıdvan Okşayan; İrfan Şimşek
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2016-03-01

3.  Shear bond strength of orthodontic color-change adhesives with different light-curing times.

Authors:  Shahin Bayani; Amirreza Ghassemi; Safa Manafi; Mohadeseh Delavarian
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2015 May-Jun

4.  Evaluation of an alternative technique to optimize direct bonding of orthodontic brackets to temporary crowns.

Authors:  Francilena Maria Campos Santos Dias; Célia Regina Maio Pinzan-Vercelino; Rudys Rodolfo de Jesus Tavares; Júlio de Araújo Gurgel; Fausto Silva Bramante; Melissa Nogueira Proença Fialho
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug

5.  The effect of an acidic food-simulating environment on the shear bond strength of self-ligating brackets with different base designs.

Authors:  Ahmad Sheibaninia; Sepehr Sepasi; Mohammad Ali Saghiri; Setareh Sepasi
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2014-09-23

6.  Effects of two soft drinks on shear bond strength and adhesive remnant index of orthodontic metal brackets.

Authors:  Soodabeh Sadat Sajadi; Gholamreza Eslami Amirabadi; Sepideh Sajadi
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2014-07-31

7.  Disinclusion of unerupted teeth by mean of self-ligating brackets: effect of blood contamination on shear bond strength.

Authors:  Andrea Scribante; Maria-Francesca Sfondrini; Sara Gatti; Paola Gandini
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2013-01-01

8.  The influence of no-primer adhesives and anchor pylons bracket bases on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets.

Authors:  Andrea Scribante; Maria Francesca Sfondrini; Danilo Fraticelli; Paola Daina; Alessandra Tamagnone; Paola Gandini
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-08-04       Impact factor: 3.411

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.