Literature DB >> 17604918

Assessing the long-term impact of drug court participation on recidivism with generalized estimating equations.

Christopher P Krebs1, Christine H Lindquist, Willem Koetse, Pamela K Lattimore.   

Abstract

Drug courts are one of the most common strategies for dealing with the large proportion of criminal offenders who are drug-involved, yet methodological limitations limit the conclusions that can be drawn from many existing evaluations of their effectiveness. The current study examined the long-term impact of drug court participation compared to regular probation on the recidivism of 475 drug-involved offenders under supervision in Hillsborough County, Florida. Using a combination of self-reported data (collected through in-person interviews at baseline, i.e., the beginning of supervision) and administrative records, the study employed a repeated measures framework (examining five 6-month time periods from baseline to 30 months post-baseline) and generalized estimating equations to compare the likelihood of being arrested between drug court participants and a matched sample of comparison offenders. The results indicate that participation in drug court was associated with a significant decrease in the likelihood of being arrested in the 12-18 months post-baseline time period. Although the drug court effect was somewhat delayed (it was not significant prior to 12 months) and short-lived (it was not significant after 18 months), the fact that significant program effects were observed during a time period that coincides with the conclusion of drug court participation for graduates and a time period well beyond initial program exposure, suggests that drug court participants are more likely than comparable offenders not exposed to drug court to remain arrest free when no longer under community supervision.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17604918      PMCID: PMC2230663          DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2007.05.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend        ISSN: 0376-8716            Impact factor:   4.492


  7 in total

Review 1.  A decade of drug treatment court research.

Authors:  Susan Turner; Douglas Longshore; Suzanne Wenzel; Elizabeth Deschenes; Peter Greenwood; Terry Fain; Adele Harrell; Andrew Morral; Faye Taxman; Martin Iguchi; Judith Greene; Duane McBride
Journal:  Subst Use Misuse       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.164

2.  Los Angeles County drug court programs: initial results.

Authors:  Jonathan E Fielding; Grace Tye; Patrick L Ogawa; Iraj J Imam; Anna M Long
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2002-10

3.  Matching Judicial Supervision to Clients' Risk Status in Drug Court.

Authors:  Douglas B Marlowe; David S Festinger; Patricia A Lee; Karen L Dugosh; Kathleen M Benasutti
Journal:  Crime Delinq       Date:  2006

4.  Client outcomes II: Longitudinal client data from the Colorado treatment outcome study.

Authors:  D L Shern; N Z Wilson; A S Coen; D C Patrick; M Foster; D A Bartsch; J Demmler
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.911

5.  Evaluation of Probation Case Management (PCM) for Drug-Involved Women Offenders.

Authors:  Monica Chan; Joseph Guydish; Rosemary Prem; Martha A Jessup; Armando Cervantes; Alan Bostrom
Journal:  Crime Delinq       Date:  2005-10-01

6.  A Drug Court Outcome Evaluation Comparing Arrests in a Two Year Follow-up Period.

Authors:  Joseph R Guydish
Journal:  J Drug Issues       Date:  2002-09

7.  Effects of diversion on adults with co-occurring mental illness and substance use: outcomes from a national multi-site study.

Authors:  Nahama Broner; Pamela K Lattimore; Alexander J Cowell; William E Schlenger
Journal:  Behav Sci Law       Date:  2004
  7 in total
  5 in total

1.  Psychiatric comorbidity and the persistence of drug use disorders in the United States.

Authors:  Miriam C Fenton; Katherine Keyes; Timothy Geier; Eliana Greenstein; Andrew Skodol; Bob Krueger; Bridget F Grant; Deborah S Hasin
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 6.526

2.  Comparative Effectiveness of California's Proposition 36 and Drug Court Programs Before and After Propensity Score Matching.

Authors:  Elizabeth Evans; Libo Li; Darren Urada; M Douglas Anglin
Journal:  Crime Delinq       Date:  2014-09

3.  Health Disparities in Drug- and Alcohol-Use Disorders: A 12-Year Longitudinal Study of Youths After Detention.

Authors:  Leah J Welty; Anna J Harrison; Karen M Abram; Nichole D Olson; David A Aaby; Kathleen P McCoy; Jason J Washburn; Linda A Teplin
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Promising practices for delivery of court-supervised substance abuse treatment: perspectives from six high-performing California counties operating Proposition 36.

Authors:  Elizabeth Evans; M Douglas Anglin; Darren Urada; Joy Yang
Journal:  Eval Program Plann       Date:  2010-09-29

5.  Examining the impact of case management in Vancouver's downtown community court: a quasi-experimental design.

Authors:  Julian M Somers; Akm Moniruzzaman; Stefanie N Rezansoff; Michelle Patterson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.