Literature DB >> 17604767

Clinical correlation of radiological spinal stenosis after standardization for vertebral body size.

A Athiviraham1, D Yen, C Scott, D Soboleski.   

Abstract

AIM: To determine the relationship between the degree of radiographic lumbar spinal stenosis, adjusted with an internal control for vertebral body size, and disability from lumbar stenosis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: one hundred and twenty-three consecutive patients with clinical and radiological confirmation of neural impingement secondary to lumbar stenosis were enrolled prospectively. Thecal sac anteroposterior (AP) diameter (TSD) and cross-sectional area (CSA), and vertebral body AP dimension (VBD) were determined. These parameters were then correlated with patients' symptoms using the modified Roland-Morris questionnaire (RMQ) disability score.
RESULTS: No statistically significant inverse correlation was found between the TSD and RMQ score (p=0.433), between the CSA and RMQ score (p=0.124), or between the TSD:VBD ratio and RMQ score (p=0.109). There was a significant positive correlation between the CSA:VBD ratio and RMQ score (p=.036), and therefore, there was no statistical support for an inverse relationship between the two. There was a significant difference in mean RMQ scores when the patients were divided into those with CSA greater than or equal to 70 mm(2) and those less than 70 mm(2), with T=-2.104 and p=0.038.
CONCLUSION: The degree of radiographic lumbar spinal stenosis, even with the use of an internal control of vertebral body size and standardized disability questionnaires, does not correlate with clinical symptoms. However, patients with more severe stenosis below a CSA critical threshold of 70 mm(2), have significantly greater functional disability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17604767     DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2007.02.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Radiol        ISSN: 0009-9260            Impact factor:   2.350


  11 in total

1.  A new grading system of lumbar central canal stenosis on MRI: an easy and reliable method.

Authors:  Guen Young Lee; Young Lee Guen; Joon Woo Lee; Woo Lee Joon; Hee Seok Choi; Seok Choi Hee; Kyoung-Jin Oh; Oh Kyoung-Jin; Heung Sik Kang; Sik Kang Heung
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  MRI evaluation of lumbar spinal stenosis: is a rapid visual assessment as good as area measurement?

Authors:  Greger Lønne; Bent Ødegård; Lars Gunnar Johnsen; Tore K Solberg; Kjell Arne Kvistad; Øystein P Nygaard
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Step activity monitoring in lumbar stenosis patients undergoing decompressive surgery.

Authors:  Tobias L Schulte; Tim Schubert; Corinna Winter; Mirko Brandes; Lars Hackenberg; Hansdetlef Wassmann; Dennis Liem; Dieter Rosenbaum; Viola Bullmann
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis and lumbar spine configuration.

Authors:  J Abbas; K Hamoud; H May; O Hay; B Medlej; Y Masharawi; N Peled; I Hershkovitz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Comparative Analysis of Lumbar Spine Vertebral Morphology Between Māori and New Zealand Europeans: A Computed Tomography Study.

Authors:  William H Cook; Joseph F Baker
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2021-12

6.  Comparison of the oswestry disability index and magnetic resonance imaging findings in lumbar canal stenosis: an observational study.

Authors:  Vijay G Goni; Aravind Hampannavar; Nirmal Raj Gopinathan; Paramjeet Singh; Pebam Sudesh; Rajesh Kumar Logithasan; Anurag Sharma; Shashidhar Bk; Radheshyam Sament
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2014-02-06

7.  Pullout of a lumbar plate with varying screw lengths.

Authors:  Daniel Kyle Palmer; David Rios; Wyzscx Merfil Patacxil; Paul A Williams; Wayne K Cheng; Serkan İnceoğlu
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2012-12-01

8.  Efficacy of percutaneous epidural neuroplasty does not correlate with dural sac cross-sectional area in single level disc disease.

Authors:  Gyu Yeul Ji; Chang Hyun Oh; Bongju Moon; Seung Hyun Choi; Dong Ah Shin; Young Sul Yoon; Keung Nyun Kim
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.759

9.  Radiographic indices for lumbar developmental spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Jason Pui Yin Cheung; Karen Ka Man Ng; Prudence Wing Hang Cheung; Dino Samartzis; Kenneth Man Chee Cheung
Journal:  Scoliosis Spinal Disord       Date:  2017-02-20

10.  Can the severity of central lumbar stenosis affect the results of nerve conduction study?

Authors:  Seung Wha Jang; Dong Gyu Lee
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.