Thomas Michels1, Nils Lehmann, Susanne Moebus. 1. Practice for Internal Medicine, Hematology, Radiology, Natural Cure, Cologne (Köln), Germany. dr.th.michels@web.de
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Cervical vertigo (CV) is commonly attributed to a disturbed cervical proprioception and is associated with cervical pain (CP). It is assumed to respond to a treatment that improves CP. In a prospective observational study, we examined whether a treatment originally devised for patients with CP could improve CV also in cases without CP. DESIGN: During a period of 3 years, a total of 238 consecutive patients, 41 patients with CV only, 43 patients with CV and CP, 154 patients with CP only, received the same treatment, which consisted of local anaesthetics applied on average in 8 sessions to a fixed set of epidermal, epithelial, and periosteal locations. Outcome was relief of symptoms measured by a verbal-analogue scale at the end of therapy and on average a year later. RESULTS: At the end of therapy, 58% of patients with CV responded with complete remissions compared to 41% of patients with CP. At follow-up a year later, there were complete remissions in more than 50% in CV as well as in CP. CONCLUSIONS: The applied therapy led to complete remissions of long duration in a high percentage of patients with CV even when symptoms of CP were missing. This therapy produced good effects for CP as well. Its neurophysiological basis is discussed and may offer a new approach not only to the treatment of CV and CP but in a general sense also to that of acute, chronic, and neuropathic pain. It needs to be emphasized, however, that this study was not a randomized controlled trial and its encouraging results have to be proved by further research.
OBJECTIVES: Cervical vertigo (CV) is commonly attributed to a disturbed cervical proprioception and is associated with cervical pain (CP). It is assumed to respond to a treatment that improves CP. In a prospective observational study, we examined whether a treatment originally devised for patients with CP could improve CV also in cases without CP. DESIGN: During a period of 3 years, a total of 238 consecutive patients, 41 patients with CV only, 43 patients with CV and CP, 154 patients with CP only, received the same treatment, which consisted of local anaesthetics applied on average in 8 sessions to a fixed set of epidermal, epithelial, and periosteal locations. Outcome was relief of symptoms measured by a verbal-analogue scale at the end of therapy and on average a year later. RESULTS: At the end of therapy, 58% of patients with CV responded with complete remissions compared to 41% of patients with CP. At follow-up a year later, there were complete remissions in more than 50% in CV as well as in CP. CONCLUSIONS: The applied therapy led to complete remissions of long duration in a high percentage of patients with CV even when symptoms of CP were missing. This therapy produced good effects for CP as well. Its neurophysiological basis is discussed and may offer a new approach not only to the treatment of CV and CP but in a general sense also to that of acute, chronic, and neuropathic pain. It needs to be emphasized, however, that this study was not a randomized controlled trial and its encouraging results have to be proved by further research.