OBJECTIVE: Cell free foetal DNA (cff DNA) extracted from maternal plasma is now recognized as a potential source for prenatal diagnosis but the methodology is currently not well standardized. To evaluate different manual and automated DNA extraction methods with a view to developing standards, an International Workshop was performed. METHODS: Three plasma pools from RhD-negative pregnant women, a DNA standard, real-time-PCR protocol, primers and probes for RHD were sent to 12 laboratories and also to one company (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). In pre-tests, pool 3 showed a low cff DNA concentration, pool 1 showed a higher concentration and pool 2 an intermediate concentration. RESULTS: The QIAamp DSP Virus Kit, the High Pure PCR Template Preparation Kit, an in-house protocol using the QIAamp DNA Blood Mini Kit, the CST genomic DNA purification kit, the Magna Pure LC, the MDx, the M48, the EZ1 and an in-house protocol using magnetic beads for manual and automated extraction were the methods that were able to reliably detect foetal RHD. The best results were obtained with the QIAamp DSP Virus Kit. The QIAamp DNA Blood Mini Kit showed very comparable results in laboratories that followed the manufacturer's protocol and started with > or = 500 microL plasma. One participant using the QIAamp DNA Blood Midi Kit failed to detect reliably RHD in pool 3. CONCLUSIONS: This workshop initiated a standardization process for extraction of cff DNA in maternal plasma. The highest yield was obtained by the QIAamp DSP Virus Kit, a result that will be evaluated in more detail in future studies. 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
OBJECTIVE: Cell free foetal DNA (cff DNA) extracted from maternal plasma is now recognized as a potential source for prenatal diagnosis but the methodology is currently not well standardized. To evaluate different manual and automated DNA extraction methods with a view to developing standards, an International Workshop was performed. METHODS: Three plasma pools from RhD-negative pregnant women, a DNA standard, real-time-PCR protocol, primers and probes for RHD were sent to 12 laboratories and also to one company (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). In pre-tests, pool 3 showed a low cff DNA concentration, pool 1 showed a higher concentration and pool 2 an intermediate concentration. RESULTS: The QIAamp DSP Virus Kit, the High Pure PCR Template Preparation Kit, an in-house protocol using the QIAamp DNA Blood Mini Kit, the CST genomic DNA purification kit, the Magna Pure LC, the MDx, the M48, the EZ1 and an in-house protocol using magnetic beads for manual and automated extraction were the methods that were able to reliably detect foetal RHD. The best results were obtained with the QIAamp DSP Virus Kit. The QIAamp DNA Blood Mini Kit showed very comparable results in laboratories that followed the manufacturer's protocol and started with > or = 500 microL plasma. One participant using the QIAamp DNA Blood Midi Kit failed to detect reliably RHD in pool 3. CONCLUSIONS: This workshop initiated a standardization process for extraction of cff DNA in maternal plasma. The highest yield was obtained by the QIAamp DSP Virus Kit, a result that will be evaluated in more detail in future studies. 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
Authors: Robert M Silver; Leslie Myatt; John C Hauth; Kenneth J Leveno; Alan M Peaceman; Susan M Ramin; Philip Samuels; George Saade; Yoram Sorokin; Rebecca G Clifton; Uma M Reddy Journal: Am J Perinatol Date: 2016-07-11 Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: Elena Picchiassi; Gian Carlo Di Renzo; Federica Tarquini; Vittorio Bini; Michela Centra; Luana Pennacchi; Fabiana Galeone; Mara Micanti; Giuliana Coata Journal: Transfus Med Hemother Date: 2014-12-22 Impact factor: 3.747
Authors: Ji Hyae Lim; Mee Jin Kim; Shin Young Kim; Hye Ok Kim; Mee Jin Song; Min Hyoung Kim; So Yeon Park; Jae Hyug Yang; Hyun Mee Ryu Journal: J Assist Reprod Genet Date: 2010-10-21 Impact factor: 3.412
Authors: Floriana Della Ragione; Paola Mastrovito; Ciro Campanile; Anna Conti; Elisavet A Papageorgiou; Maj A Hultén; Philippos C Patsalis; Nigel P Carter; Maurizio D'Esposito Journal: J Mol Diagn Date: 2010-09-16 Impact factor: 5.568