Literature DB >> 17604306

Atrial fibrillatory rate and risk of left atrial thrombus in atrial fibrillation.

Andreas Bollmann1, Daniela Husser, Martin Stridh, Fredrik Holmqvist, Anders Roijer, Carl J Meurling, Leif Sörnmo, S Bertil Olsson.   

Abstract

AIMS: In atrial fibrillation (AF), a relation between electrocardiogram (ECG) fibrillatory wave amplitude and thrombus formation has been sought for long with conflicting results. In contrast, the possible relation between atrial fibrillatory rate obtained from the surface ECG and left atrial thrombus formation in patients with AF is unknown and was consequently evaluated in this study. METHODS AND
RESULTS: One-hundred and twenty-five patients (mean age 64 +/- 12 years, 72% male) with persistent non-valvular AF (mean duration 28 +/- 80 days) undergoing transesophageal echocardiography were studied. In all patients, standard 12-lead ECG recordings were acquired before the examination. Atrial fibrillatory rate was determined using spatiotemporal QRST cancellation and time-frequency analysis of lead V1. Atrial fibrillatory rate measured 401 +/- 63 fibrillations per minute (fpm, range 235-566 fpm) and was related with age (R = -0.326, P < 0.001), ventricular rate (R = -0.202, P = 0.024), gender (407 +/- 62 in males vs. 387 +/- 64 fpm in females, P = 0.038) but not AF duration (R = 0.088, P = 0.374), presence of lone AF (408 +/- 66 vs. 394 +/- 58 fpm, P = 0.228), or beta-blocker or calcium channel blocker treatment (398 +/- 63 vs. 405 +/- 62 fpm, P = 0.556). Age was the only independent predictor of fibrillatory rate (B = -1.714, P < 0.001). In patients with left atrial thrombus (n = 10), spontaneous echo contrast (SEC) was more frequently present (70 vs. 29 %, p = 0.007) and left atrial appendage (LAA) outflow velocity was lower (26 +/- 20 vs. 37 +/- 15 cm/s, P = 0.012) than in patients without thrombus (n = 115). In contrast, mean fibrillatory rate, which showed a weak inverse correlation with LAA velocity (R = -0.118, P = 0.048) was not different between both groups (380 +/- 56 vs. 403 +/- 63 fpm, P = 0.226). Similarly, presence of thrombus and SEC combined was not related with fibrillatory rate.
CONCLUSION: Atrial fibrillatory rate obtained from surface ECG lead V1 is not a risk marker for left atrial thrombus formation in AF.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17604306     DOI: 10.1093/europace/eum125

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Europace        ISSN: 1099-5129            Impact factor:   5.214


  3 in total

1.  Giant atrium, giant clot: need for anticoagulation.

Authors:  Faisal Majeed; Murad Abdelsalam; Tamim Nashad; Anupam A Sule
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2017-11-09

2.  Fine versus coarse atrial fibrillation in rheumatic mitral stenosis: The impact of aging and the clinical significance.

Authors:  Leili Pourafkari; Aidin Baghbani-Oskouei; Naser Aslanabadi; Arezou Tajlil; Samad Ghaffari; Ali Mosavi Sadigh; Safa Savadi-Oskouei; Elgar Enamzadeh; Raziyeh Parizad; Nader D Nader
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 1.468

3.  [Atrial fibrillation, frequency, etiologic factors, evolution and treatment in a cardiology department in Dakar, Senegal].

Authors:  Alassane Mbaye; Soulemane Pessinaba; Malick Bodian; Bamba Ndiaye Mouhamadou; Fatou Mbaye; Adama Kane; Valentin Yaméogo Nobila; Maboury Diao; Abdoul Kane
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2010-08-25
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.