Literature DB >> 17604074

VEPs elicited by local correlations and global symmetry: characteristics and interactions.

Sadanori Oka1, Jonathan D Victor, Mary M Conte, Toshio Yanagida.   

Abstract

Psychophysical and fMRI studies have indicated that visual processing of global symmetry has distinctive scaling properties, and proceeds more slowly than analysis of contrast, spatial frequency, and texture. We therefore undertook a visual evoked potential (VEP) study to directly compare the dynamics of symmetry and texture processing, and to determine the extent to which they interact. Stimuli consisted of interchange between structured and random black-and-white checkerboard stimuli. For symmetry, structured stimuli were colored with 2-fold symmetry (horizontal or vertical mirror), 4-fold symmetry (both mirror axes), and 8-fold symmetry (oblique mirror axes added). For texture, structured stimuli were colored according to the "even" isodipole texture [Julesz, B., Gilbert, E. N., & Victor, J. D. (1978). Visual discrimination of textures with identical third-order statistics. Biological Cybernetics, 31, 137-140]. Thus, all stimuli had the same contrast, and check size, but differed substantially in correlation structure. To separate components of the VEP related to symmetry and texture from components that could be generated by local luminance and contrast changes, we extracted the odd-harmonic components of the VEP (recorded at C(z)-O(z), C(z)-O(1), C(z)-O(2), C(z)-P(z)) elicited by structured-random interchange. Responses to symmetry were largest for the 8-fold patterns, and progressively smaller for 4-fold, vertical, and horizontal symmetry patterns. Eightfold patterns were therefore used in the remainder of the study. The symmetry response is shifted to larger checks and lower temporal frequencies compared to the response to texture, and its temporal tuning is broader. Processing of symmetry makes use of neural mechanisms with larger receptive fields, and slower, more sustained temporal tuning characteristics than those involved in the analysis of texture. Sparse stimuli were used to dissociate check size and check density. VEP responses to sparse symmetry stimuli showed that there is no difference between first- and second-order symmetry for densities less than 12.5%. We discuss these findings in relation to local and global visual processes.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17604074      PMCID: PMC2041857          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.03.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  42 in total

1.  Human symmetry detection exhibits reverse eccentricity scaling.

Authors:  C W Tyler
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1999 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.241

2.  Discriminating mirror symmetry in foveal and extra-foveal vision.

Authors:  B T Barrett; D Whitaker; P V McGraw; A M Herbert
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Visual working memory for image statistics.

Authors:  Jonathan D Victor; Mary M Conte
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Predominantly extra-retinotopic cortical response to pattern symmetry.

Authors:  Christopher W Tyler; Heidi A Baseler; Leonid L Kontsevich; Lora T Likova; Alex R Wade; Brian A Wandell
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-11-26       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  The effects of opposite-polarity dipoles on the detection of Glass patterns.

Authors:  David Burr; John Ross
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-10-25       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Interactions between luminance and contrast signals in global form detection.

Authors:  David R Badcock; Colin W G Clifford; Sieu K Khuu
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Pattern recognition in humans: correlations which cannot be perceived.

Authors:  L Glass; E Switkes
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 1.490

8.  Moiré effect from random dots.

Authors:  L Glass
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1969-08-09       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Motion- and orientation-specific cortical responses in infancy.

Authors:  Oliver Braddick; Deirdre Birtles; John Wattam-Bell; Janette Atkinson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-08-30       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Striate cortex in humans demonstrates the relationship between activation and variations in visual form.

Authors:  L L Beason-Held; K P Purpura; J S Krasuski; R E Desmond; D J Mangot; E M Daly; L M Optican; S I Rapoport; J W VanMeter
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  8 in total

1.  Visual acuity evaluated by pattern-reversal visual-evoked potential is affected by check size/visual angle.

Authors:  Xiping Chen; Qianqian Li; Xiaoqin Liu; Li Yang; Wentao Xia; Luyang Tao
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 5.203

2.  Rapid processing of closure and viewpoint-invariant symmetry: behavioral criteria for feedforward processing.

Authors:  Filipp Schmidt; Thomas Schmidt
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-02-13

3.  Lessons from a catalogue of 6674 brain recordings.

Authors:  Alexis D J Makin; John Tyson-Carr; Giulia Rampone; Yiovanna Derpsch; Damien Wright; Marco Bertamini
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 8.713

4.  Sustained response to symmetry in extrastriate areas after stimulus offset: An EEG study.

Authors:  Marco Bertamini; Giulia Rampone; Jennifer Oulton; Semir Tatlidil; Alexis D J Makin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  The extrastriate symmetry response can be elicited by flowers and landscapes as well as abstract shapes.

Authors:  Alexis D J Makin; Giulia Rampone; Elena Karakashevska; Marco Bertamini
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Source dipole analysis reveals a new brain response to visual symmetry.

Authors:  John Tyson-Carr; Marco Bertamini; Giulia Rampone; Alexis Makin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Fly Photoreceptors Encode Phase Congruency.

Authors:  Uwe Friederich; Stephen A Billings; Roger C Hardie; Mikko Juusola; Daniel Coca
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Symmetric patterns with different luminance polarity (anti-symmetry) generate an automatic response in extrastriate cortex.

Authors:  Alexis D J Makin; Giulia Rampone; Marco Bertamini
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 3.386

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.