Literature DB >> 17603796

Recurrence risk in de novo structural chromosomal rearrangements.

Benno Röthlisberger1, Dieter Kotzot.   

Abstract

According to the textbook of Gardner and Sutherland [2004], the standard on genetic counseling for chromosome abnormalities, the recurrence risk of de novo structural or combined structural and numeric chromosome rearrangements is less than 0.5-2% and takes into account recurrence by chance, gonadal mosaicism, and somatic-gonadal mosaicism. However, these figures are roughly estimated and neither any systematic study nor exact or evidence-based risk calculations are available. To address this question, an extensive literature search was performed and surprisingly only 29 case reports of recurrence of de novo structural or combined structural and numeric chromosomal rearrangements were found. Thirteen of them were with a trisomy 21 due to an i(21q) replacing one normal chromosome 21. In eight of them low-level mosaicism in one of the parents was found either in fibroblasts or in blood or in both. As a consequence of the low number of cases and theoretical considerations (clinical consequences, mechanisms of formation, etc.), the recurrence risk should be reduced to less than 1% for a de novo i(21q) and to even less than 0.3% for all other de novo structural or combined structural and numeric chromosomal rearrangements. As the latter is lower than the commonly accepted risk of approximately 0.3% for indicating an invasive prenatal diagnosis and as the risk of abortion of a healthy fetus after chorionic villous sampling or amniocentesis is higher than approximately 0.5%, invasive prenatal investigation in most cases is not indicated and should only be performed if explicitly asked by the parents subsequent to appropriate genetic counseling. (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17603796     DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.31826

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet A        ISSN: 1552-4825            Impact factor:   2.802


  7 in total

1.  Recurrent 70.8 Mb 4q22.2q32.3 duplication due to ovarian germinal mosaicism.

Authors:  Lucie Tosca; Sophie Brisset; François M Petit; Laure Lecerf; Ghislaine Rousseau; Cécile Bas; Mireille Laroudie; Marie-Laure Maurin; Sylvie Tapia; Olivier Picone; Sophie Prevot; Michel Goossens; Philippe Labrune; Gérard Tachdjian
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Parent of origin, mosaicism, and recurrence risk: probabilistic modeling explains the broken symmetry of transmission genetics.

Authors:  Ian M Campbell; Jonathan R Stewart; Regis A James; James R Lupski; Paweł Stankiewicz; Peter Olofsson; Chad A Shaw
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Two families with sibling recurrence of the 17q21.31 microdeletion syndrome due to low-grade mosaicism.

Authors:  David A Koolen; Juliette Dupont; Nicole de Leeuw; Lisenka E L M Vissers; Simone P A van den Heuvel; Alyson Bradbury; James Steer; Arjan P M de Brouwer; Leo P Ten Kate; Willy M Nillesen; Bert B A de Vries; Michael J Parker
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 4.246

4.  Mutation rates and the evolution of germline structure.

Authors:  Aylwyn Scally
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Cytogenomic characterization of 1q43q44 deletion associated with 4q32.1q35.2 duplication and phenotype correlation.

Authors:  A M Mohamed; H T El-Bassyouni; A M El-Gerzawy; S A Hammad; N A Helmy; A K Kamel; S I Ismail; M Y Issa; O Eid; M S Zaki
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 2.009

6.  Parental somatic mosaicism is underrecognized and influences recurrence risk of genomic disorders.

Authors:  Ian M Campbell; Bo Yuan; Caroline Robberecht; Rolph Pfundt; Przemyslaw Szafranski; Meriel E McEntagart; Sandesh C S Nagamani; Ayelet Erez; Magdalena Bartnik; Barbara Wiśniowiecka-Kowalnik; Katie S Plunkett; Amber N Pursley; Sung-Hae L Kang; Weimin Bi; Seema R Lalani; Carlos A Bacino; Mala Vast; Karen Marks; Michael Patton; Peter Olofsson; Ankita Patel; Joris A Veltman; Sau Wai Cheung; Chad A Shaw; Lisenka E L M Vissers; Joris R Vermeesch; James R Lupski; Paweł Stankiewicz
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Detection of germline mosaicism in fathers of children with intellectual disability syndromes caused by de novo variants.

Authors:  Sofia Frisk; Alexandra Wachtmeister; Tobias Laurell; Anna Lindstrand; Nina Jäntti; Helena Malmgren; Kristina Lagerstedt-Robinson; Bianca Tesi; Fulya Taylan; Ann Nordgren
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 2.183

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.