BACKGROUND: Colon cancer becomes resistant to apoptosis as it acquires metastatic potential. SW480 and SW620 colon cancer cells were established from the same patient at different stages of tumor progression. The stage III colorectal cancer cell line (SW620) is more resistant to apoptosis. In the present report, we investigated the apoptotic gene products that might account for colon cancer evasion of immune attack and chemoradioresistance-induced apoptosis. METHODS: SW480 and SW620 cells were used for this experiment. Type 1 apoptosis was induced by CH-11. Type 2 apoptosis was induced by cisplatin and ionizing radiation. Apoptosis was determined by caspase-3 activity and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase mediated dUTP nick end labeling. Gene products Fas, TRAIL, c-FLIP, Bid, BAX, Bcl-2, Bcl-xL, Apaf-1, nuclear factor-kappa B, Smac/DIABLO, apoptosis inducing factor, and the inhibitors of apoptosis were investigated by immunocytochemistry and Western blot analyses. RESULTS: SW620 cell lines were more resistant to both Type 1 and Type 2 apoptosis induced by CH-11, cisplatin, and ionizing radiation, respectively. Examination of the extrinsic pathway demonstrated Fas receptor to be down-regulated in SW620. Apaf-1 was decreased in SW620 cells; while other members of the mitochondrial pathway including Bax, Bid, Bcl-xL, and Bcl-2 demonstrated minimal alterations of protein levels in both cell lines. Survivin and XIAP protein levels were increased in SW620 cells, which correlated with nuclear expression of nuclear factor-kappa B in SW620 cells but not SW480. Mitochondrial-released factors including Smac/DIABLO and apoptosis inducing factor were increased in SW480 cells. CONCLUSIONS: SW620 cells have acquired genetic defects both in the intrinsic and extrinsic pathways of apoptosis, which may explain in part the ability of colon cancer cells to escape the immune system and to become chemoradioresistant. These genes may be potential targets for chemoradiosensitization in advanced colorectal cancer.
BACKGROUND:Colon cancer becomes resistant to apoptosis as it acquires metastatic potential. SW480 and SW620 colon cancer cells were established from the same patient at different stages of tumor progression. The stage III colorectal cancer cell line (SW620) is more resistant to apoptosis. In the present report, we investigated the apoptotic gene products that might account for colon cancer evasion of immune attack and chemoradioresistance-induced apoptosis. METHODS: SW480 and SW620 cells were used for this experiment. Type 1 apoptosis was induced by CH-11. Type 2 apoptosis was induced by cisplatin and ionizing radiation. Apoptosis was determined by caspase-3 activity and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase mediated dUTP nick end labeling. Gene products Fas, TRAIL, c-FLIP, Bid, BAX, Bcl-2, Bcl-xL, Apaf-1, nuclear factor-kappa B, Smac/DIABLO, apoptosis inducing factor, and the inhibitors of apoptosis were investigated by immunocytochemistry and Western blot analyses. RESULTS: SW620 cell lines were more resistant to both Type 1 and Type 2 apoptosis induced by CH-11, cisplatin, and ionizing radiation, respectively. Examination of the extrinsic pathway demonstrated Fas receptor to be down-regulated in SW620. Apaf-1 was decreased in SW620 cells; while other members of the mitochondrial pathway including Bax, Bid, Bcl-xL, and Bcl-2 demonstrated minimal alterations of protein levels in both cell lines. Survivin and XIAP protein levels were increased in SW620 cells, which correlated with nuclear expression of nuclear factor-kappa B in SW620 cells but not SW480. Mitochondrial-released factors including Smac/DIABLO and apoptosis inducing factor were increased in SW480 cells. CONCLUSIONS: SW620 cells have acquired genetic defects both in the intrinsic and extrinsic pathways of apoptosis, which may explain in part the ability of colon cancer cells to escape the immune system and to become chemoradioresistant. These genes may be potential targets for chemoradiosensitization in advanced colorectal cancer.
Authors: Xiao-Wen Zhang; Ning Liu; Sheng Chen; Y E Wang; Kai-Lai Sun; Zhen-Ming Xu; Wei-Neng Fu Journal: Oncol Lett Date: 2015-05-20 Impact factor: 2.967
Authors: Wibisono Hartojo; Amy L Silvers; Dafydd G Thomas; Christopher W Seder; Lin Lin; Hyma Rao; Zhuwen Wang; Joel K Greenson; Thomas J Giordano; Mark B Orringer; Alnawaz Rehemtulla; Mahaveer S Bhojani; David G Beer; Andrew C Chang Journal: Transl Oncol Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 4.243
Authors: Kannan Badri Narayanan; Manaf Ali; Barry J Barclay; Qiang Shawn Cheng; Leandro D'Abronzo; Rita Dornetshuber-Fleiss; Paramita M Ghosh; Michael J Gonzalez Guzman; Tae-Jin Lee; Po Sing Leung; Lin Li; Suidjit Luanpitpong; Edward Ratovitski; Yon Rojanasakul; Maria Fiammetta Romano; Simona Romano; Ranjeet K Sinha; Clement Yedjou; Fahd Al-Mulla; Rabeah Al-Temaimi; Amedeo Amedei; Dustin G Brown; Elizabeth P Ryan; Annamaria Colacci; Roslida A Hamid; Chiara Mondello; Jayadev Raju; Hosni K Salem; Jordan Woodrick; A Ivana Scovassi; Neetu Singh; Monica Vaccari; Rabindra Roy; Stefano Forte; Lorenzo Memeo; Seo Yun Kim; William H Bisson; Leroy Lowe; Hyun Ho Park Journal: Carcinogenesis Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 4.944
Authors: James W Hodge; Charlie T Garnett; Benedetto Farsaci; Claudia Palena; Kwong-Yok Tsang; Soldano Ferrone; Sofia R Gameiro Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2013-03-16 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Eric M Lewis; Amanda S Wilkinson; Jacqueline S Jackson; Rohit Mehra; Sooryanarayana Varambally; Arul M Chinnaiyan; John C Wilkinson Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2012-11-01 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: T Trarbach; M Moehler; V Heinemann; C-H Köhne; M Przyborek; C Schulz; V Sneller; G Gallant; S Kanzler Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2010-01-12 Impact factor: 7.640