Literature DB >> 17602071

Residual ductal carcinoma in situ in patients with complete eradication of invasive breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy does not adversely affect patient outcome.

Chafika Mazouni1, Florentia Peintinger, Shu Wan-Kau, Fabrice Andre, Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo, W Fraser Symmans, Funda Meric-Bernstam, Vicente Valero, Gabriel N Hortobagyi, Lajos Pusztai.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether residual ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) after completion of preoperative chemotherapy affects the outcome of patients with histologically defined complete eradication of invasive cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of a database including 2,302 breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy at The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center between 1980 and 2004 was performed. The overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and local recurrence-free survival were compared for patients with no residual invasive or in situ cancer (pathologic complete response [pCR]) and patients with no residual invasive cancer but persistent in situ disease (pCR+DCIS).
RESULTS: The mean follow-up time was 250 months. Of the 2,302 treated patients, 78 (3.4%) had pCR, 199 (8.6%) had pCR+DCIS, and 2,025 (88%) had residual invasive cancer. For patients with pCR and pCR+DCIS, the 5-year DFS rates (87.1% in both groups) and 10-year DFS rates (81.3% v 81.7%, respectively) were similar; the 5-year OS rates (91.9% v 92.5%, respectively) and 10-year OS rates (91.8% v 92.5%, respectively) were also similar and significantly better than the rate of patients with residual invasive cancer (74.4%; P < .001). The 5-year locoregional recurrence-free survival rates were also not different between patients with pCR (92.8%; 95% CI, 86.1% to 96.4%) and patients with pCR+DCIS (90.9%; 95% CI, 77.3% to 96.5%; P = .63).
CONCLUSION: Residual DCIS in patients who experience complete eradication of the invasive cancer in the breast and lymph nodes does not adversely affect survival or local recurrence rate. Inclusion of patients with residual DCIS in the definition of pCR is justified when this outcome is used as an early surrogate for long-term survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17602071     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.08.2271

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  89 in total

1.  Response and prognosis of taxanes and anthracyclines neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Jiannan Wu; Shunrong Li; Weijuan Jia; Fengxi Su
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 4.553

2.  Neutralization of BCL-2/XL Enhances the Cytotoxicity of T-DM1 In Vivo.

Authors:  Jason J Zoeller; Aleksandr Vagodny; Krishan Taneja; Benjamin Y Tan; Neil O'Brien; Dennis J Slamon; Deepak Sampath; Joel D Leverson; Roderick T Bronson; Deborah A Dillon; Joan S Brugge
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 6.261

Review 3.  Neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer: assessing treatment progress and managing poor responders.

Authors:  Robert Wesolowski; Georg Thomas Budd
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.075

4.  Inflammatory breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: can magnetic resonance imaging precisely diagnose the final pathological response?

Authors:  J-H Chen; R S Mehta; O Nalcioglu; M-Y Su
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Pathological complete response in breast cancer patients following neoadjuvant chemotherapy at a Comprehensive Cancer Center: The natural history of an elusive prognosticator.

Authors:  Oluwadamilola M Fayanju; Iheoma Nwaogu; Donna B Jeffe; Julie A Margenthaler
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-03-31

6.  A gene expression signature that predicts the therapeutic response of the basal-like breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Yiing Lin; Shin Lin; Mark Watson; Kathryn M Trinkaus; Sacha Kuo; Michael J Naughton; Katherine Weilbaecher; Timothy P Fleming; Rebecca L Aft
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2009-12-06       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Quality of pathologic response and surgery correlate with survival for patients with completely resected bladder cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Guru Sonpavde; Bryan H Goldman; V O Speights; Seth P Lerner; David P Wood; Nicholas J Vogelzang; Donald L Trump; Ronald B Natale; H Barton Grossman; E David Crawford
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Predictors of recurrence in breast cancer patients with a pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  M Tanioka; C Shimizu; K Yonemori; K Yoshimura; K Tamura; T Kouno; M Ando; N Katsumata; H Tsuda; T Kinoshita; Y Fujiwara
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-07-06       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  The relevance of breast cancer subtypes in the outcome of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  M E Straver; E J Th Rutgers; S Rodenhuis; S C Linn; C E Loo; J Wesseling; N S Russell; H S A Oldenburg; N Antonini; M T F D Vrancken Peeters
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Predicting pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer by using MR imaging and quantitative 1H MR spectroscopy.

Authors:  Hyeon-Man Baek; Jeon-Hor Chen; Ke Nie; Hon J Yu; Shadfar Bahri; Rita S Mehta; Orhan Nalcioglu; Min-Ying Su
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 11.105

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.