Wesley J Kasprow1, Robert A Rosenheck. 1. Northeast Program Evaluation Center 182, Department of Veterans Affairs, Connecticut Health Care System, 950 Campbell Ave., West Haven, CT 06516, USA. wesley.kasprow@yale.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated a modification of the critical time intervention (CTI) community case management model for homeless veterans with mental illness who were leaving Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) inpatient care. CTI offers time-limited intensive case management designed to negotiate transitions from institutional settings to community living. METHODS: CTI was implemented at eight VA medical centers through a training program that used primarily teleconference-based case review. A comparison cohort (phase 1) of 278 participants was recruited before CTI was implemented, and a treatment cohort (phase 2) of 206 participants was recruited after implementation and offered CTI. Mixed-regression models were used to compare outcomes in phase 1 and phase 2 and controlled for baseline differences between participants in the two phases. RESULTS: Measures of client service delivery show that CTI was successfully implemented at most sites. Phase 1 veterans had a better work history and more drug use at baseline than phase 2 clients had. Controlling for these differences, veterans in phase 2 on average had 19% more days housed in each 90-day reporting period over the one-year follow-up (p<.002) and 14% fewer days in institutional settings (p=.041). Veterans in phase 2 also had 19% lower Addiction Severity Index (ASI) alcohol use scores (p<.001), 14% lower ASI drug use scores (p=.003), and 8% lower ASI psychiatric problem scores (p=.001). CONCLUSIONS: A sustained training program can be used to implement CTI in systems that have little past experience with this approach and can yield improved housing and mental health outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated a modification of the critical time intervention (CTI) community case management model for homeless veterans with mental illness who were leaving Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) inpatient care. CTI offers time-limited intensive case management designed to negotiate transitions from institutional settings to community living. METHODS:CTI was implemented at eight VA medical centers through a training program that used primarily teleconference-based case review. A comparison cohort (phase 1) of 278 participants was recruited before CTI was implemented, and a treatment cohort (phase 2) of 206 participants was recruited after implementation and offered CTI. Mixed-regression models were used to compare outcomes in phase 1 and phase 2 and controlled for baseline differences between participants in the two phases. RESULTS: Measures of client service delivery show that CTI was successfully implemented at most sites. Phase 1 veterans had a better work history and more drug use at baseline than phase 2 clients had. Controlling for these differences, veterans in phase 2 on average had 19% more days housed in each 90-day reporting period over the one-year follow-up (p<.002) and 14% fewer days in institutional settings (p=.041). Veterans in phase 2 also had 19% lower Addiction Severity Index (ASI) alcohol use scores (p<.001), 14% lower ASI drug use scores (p=.003), and 8% lower ASI psychiatric problem scores (p=.001). CONCLUSIONS: A sustained training program can be used to implement CTI in systems that have little past experience with this approach and can yield improved housing and mental health outcomes.
Authors: Renée de Vet; Maurice J A van Luijtelaar; Sonja N Brilleslijper-Kater; Wouter Vanderplasschen; Mariëlle D Beijersbergen; Judith R L M Wolf Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2013-08-15 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Daniel B Herman; Sarah Conover; Prakash Gorroochurn; Kinjia Hinterland; Lori Hoepner; Ezra S Susser Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2011-07 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: W Wolfgang Fleischhacker; Celso Arango; Paul Arteel; Thomas R E Barnes; William Carpenter; Ken Duckworth; Silvana Galderisi; Lisa Halpern; Martin Knapp; Stephen R Marder; Mary Moller; Norman Sartorius; Peter Woodruff Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Thomas E Smith; Morgan Haselden; Tom Corbeil; Melanie M Wall; Fei Tang; Susan M Essock; Eric Frimpong; Matthew L Goldman; Franco Mascayano; Marleen Radigan; Matthew Schneider; Rui Wang; Lisa B Dixon; Mark Olfson Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2021-03-04 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: Saloni Dev; Tanvi Kankan; Drew Blasco; PhuongThao D Le; Martin Agrest; Gabriella Dishy; Franco Mascayano; Sara Schilling; María José Jorquera; Catarina Dahl; Maria Tavares Cavalcanti; LeShawndra Price; Sarah Conover; Lawrence H Yang; Rubén Alvarado; Ezra S Susser Journal: Glob Ment Health (Camb) Date: 2021-04-27
Authors: Danielle A M Lako; Renée de Vet; Mariëlle D Beijersbergen; Daniel B Herman; Albert M van Hemert; Judith R L M Wolf Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2013-06-06 Impact factor: 3.295