Literature DB >> 17601179

Shared decision-making in the Netherlands--current state and future perspectives.

Trudy van der Weijden1, Haske van Veenendaal, Danielle Timmermans.   

Abstract

Dutch government policy is aimed at introducing regulated competition among health care providers and among health care insurers and at empowering patients for being involved in decision-making in health care. Along with this, many Dutch organisations have been created to foster patient orientation within health care and increase patients' power for medical decision-making. The challenge is to deliver reliable and well-balanced information for patients and the public, eg. in patient-tailored web-based formats. The approach of patient participation in medical decision-making has been formally defined in a specific law (WGBO), and the principle of recognising the patient's view is increasingly reflected in the national guidelines for health care professionals. The theme of patient participation in medical decision making is a fairly widespread research topic theme in the Netherlands, including mutual exchange among the researchers in a vivid network. The real bottleneck is perhaps the implementation of patient participation into professional practice. Some recommendations for facilitating a change are made.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17601179     DOI: 10.1016/j.zgesun.2007.02.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich        ISSN: 1431-7621


  8 in total

1.  Democratising and vitalising family practice by patient-centred medicine.

Authors:  Hakan Yaman; Melahat Akdeniz; Hasan Hüseyin Avci; Jürgen Howe
Journal:  Ment Health Fam Med       Date:  2010-12

2.  Race and shared decision-making: perspectives of African-Americans with diabetes.

Authors:  Monica E Peek; Angela Odoms-Young; Michael T Quinn; Rita Gorawara-Bhat; Shannon C Wilson; Marshall H Chin
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  How to integrate individual patient values and preferences in clinical practice guidelines? A research protocol.

Authors:  Trudy van der Weijden; France Légaré; Antoine Boivin; Jako S Burgers; Haske van Veenendaal; Anne M Stiggelbout; Marjan Faber; Glyn Elwyn
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2010-02-02       Impact factor: 7.327

4.  Designing an implementation strategy to improve interprofessional shared decision making in sciatica: study protocol of the DISC study.

Authors:  Stefanie N Hofstede; Perla J Marang-van de Mheen; Willem J J Assendelft; Carmen L A Vleggeert-Lankamp; Anne M Stiggelbout; Patrick C A J Vroomen; Wilbert B van den Hout; Thea P M Vliet Vlieland; Leti van Bodegom-Vos
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 7.327

5.  Effect of shared decision-making on therapeutic alliance in addiction health care.

Authors:  Eag Joosten; Gh de Weert; T Sensky; Cpf van der Staak; Caj de Jong
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2008-02-02       Impact factor: 2.711

6.  Barriers and facilitators to implement shared decision making in multidisciplinary sciatica care: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Stefanie N Hofstede; Perla J Marang-van de Mheen; Manon M Wentink; Anne M Stiggelbout; Carmen L A Vleggeert-Lankamp; Thea P M Vliet Vlieland; Leti van Bodegom-Vos
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 7.327

7.  Arduous implementation: does the Normalisation Process Model explain why it's so difficult to embed decision support technologies for patients in routine clinical practice.

Authors:  Glyn Elwyn; France Légaré; Trudy van der Weijden; Adrian Edwards; Carl May
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2008-12-31       Impact factor: 7.327

8.  Social support plays a role in the attitude that people have towards taking an active role in medical decision-making.

Authors:  Anne E M Brabers; Judith D de Jong; Peter P Groenewegen; Liset van Dijk
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 2.655

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.