Literature DB >> 17601175

Shared decision-making in Canada: update, challenges and where next!

France Légaré1, Dawn Stacey, Pierre-Gerlier Forest.   

Abstract

There is considerable interest for shared decision-making (SDM) within the Canadian healthcare system. The current state of SDM in Canada and challenges with implementation are addressed in the paper at three levels of patient involvement: (1) healthcare system (macro-level); (2) institutions (meso-level) and (3) clinical/medical encounter (micro-level). The legal obligation for doctors to fully disclose information enabling patients' participation in decisions has spawned professional codes and guidelines with a vision of patient's empowerment through the use of patient decision aid and SDM. Nevertheless, a survey of general practitioners in 2002 indicated that they perceived their role as relieving anxiety induced in patients rather than engaging them in informed decision-making. The virtue of SDM has gained recognition through increased research funding, medical training and some initiatives embedding patient decision aids within the process of care. Future perspectives of SDM in Canada are highlighted such as evaluation of the long-term impact of and costs associated with patient participation in decisions as well as interprofessional approaches to SDM.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17601175     DOI: 10.1016/j.zgesun.2007.02.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich        ISSN: 1431-7621


  14 in total

1.  Using decision aids to help patients navigate the "grey zone" of medical decision-making.

Authors:  Annette M O'Connor
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  User's perspectives of barriers and facilitators to implementing quality colonoscopy services in Canada: a study protocol.

Authors:  Gilles Jobin; Marie Pierre Gagnon; Bernard Candas; Catherine Dubé; Anis Ben Abdeljelil; Sonya Grenier
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 7.327

3.  How can continuing professional development better promote shared decision-making? Perspectives from an international collaboration.

Authors:  France Légaré; Hilary Bekker; Sophie Desroches; Renée Drolet; Mary C Politi; Dawn Stacey; Francine Borduas; Francine M Cheater; Jacques Cornuz; Marie-France Coutu; Nora Ferdjaoui-Moumjid; Frances Griffiths; Martin Härter; André Jacques; Tanja Krones; Michel Labrecque; Claire Neely; Charo Rodriguez; Joan Sargeant; Janet S Schuerman; Mark D Sullivan
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 7.327

4.  Patients' preference for ambulatory versus home blood pressure monitoring.

Authors:  E G Nasothimiou; N Karpettas; M G Dafni; G S Stergiou
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 3.012

5.  Physicians' perceptions of shared decision-making behaviours: a qualitative study demonstrating the continued chasm between aspirations and clinical practice.

Authors:  Rachel Zeuner; Dominick L Frosch; Marie D Kuzemchak; Mary C Politi
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 6.  Implementing clinical practice guidelines about health promotion and disease prevention through shared decision making.

Authors:  Mary C Politi; Kathleen Y Wolin; France Légaré
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Shared decision-making for people living with dementia in extended care settings: protocol for a systematic review.

Authors:  Rachel Daly; Frances Bunn; Claire Goodman
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Users' perspectives of barriers and facilitators to implementing EHR in Canada: a study protocol.

Authors:  Marie-Pierre Gagnon; Nicola Shaw; Claude Sicotte; Luc Mathieu; Yvan Leduc; Julie Duplantie; James Maclean; France Légaré
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 7.327

9.  Shared decision-making in Israel: status, barriers, and recommendations.

Authors:  Talya Miron-Shatz; Ofra Golan; Mayer Brezis; Gil Siegal; Glen M Doniger
Journal:  Isr J Health Policy Res       Date:  2012-01-30

10.  Usability testing of ANSWER: a web-based methotrexate decision aid for patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Linda C Li; Paul M Adam; Anne F Townsend; Diane Lacaille; Charlene Yousefi; Dawn Stacey; Diane Gromala; Chris D Shaw; Peter Tugwell; Catherine L Backman
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 2.796

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.