Literature DB >> 17601145

Mechanisms of nonlethal predator effect on cohort size variation: ecological and evolutionary implications.

Scott D Peacor1, Luis Schiesari, Earl E Werner.   

Abstract

Understanding the factors responsible for generating size variation in cohorts of organisms is important for predicting their population and evolutionary dynamics. We group these factors into two broad classes: those due to scaling relationships between growth and size (size-dependent factors), and those due to individual trait differences other than size (size-independent factors; e.g., morphology, behavior, etc.). We develop a framework predicting that the nonlethal presence of predators can have a strong effect on size variation, the magnitude and sign of which depend on the relative influence of both factors. We present experimental results showing that size-independent factors can strongly contribute to size variation in anuran larvae, and that the presence of a larval dragonfly predator reduced expression of these size-independent factors. Further, a review of a number of experiments shows that the effect of this predator on relative size variation of a cohort ranged from negative at low growth rates to positive at high growth rates. At high growth rates, effects of size-dependent factors predominate, and predator presence causes an increase in the scaling of growth rate with size (larger individuals respond less strongly to predator presence than small individuals). Thus predator presence led to an increase in size variation. In contrast, at low growth rates, size-independent factors were relatively more important, and predator presence reduced expression of these size-independent factors. Consequently, predator presence led to a decrease in size variation. Our results therefore indicate a further mechanism whereby nonlethal predator effects can be manifest on prey species performance. These results have strong implications for both ecological and evolutionary processes. Theoretical studies indicate that changes in cohort size variation can have profound effects on population dynamics and stability, and therefore the mere presence of a predator could have important ecological consequences. Further, changes in cohort size variation can have important evolutionary implications through changes in trait heritability.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17601145     DOI: 10.1890/06-1066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  8 in total

Review 1.  Why intraspecific trait variation matters in community ecology.

Authors:  Daniel I Bolnick; Priyanga Amarasekare; Márcio S Araújo; Reinhard Bürger; Jonathan M Levine; Mark Novak; Volker H W Rudolf; Sebastian J Schreiber; Mark C Urban; David A Vasseur
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  Consequences of intraspecific niche variation: phenotypic similarity increases competition among recently metamorphosed frogs.

Authors:  Michael F Benard; Jessica Middlemis Maher
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Resource heterogeneity, diet shifts and intra-cohort competition: effects on size divergence in YOY fish.

Authors:  Magnus Huss; Pär Byström; Lennart Persson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Effects of size and size structure on predation and inter-cohort competition in red-eyed treefrog tadpoles.

Authors:  Christopher M Asquith; James R Vonesh
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-05-06       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  A method for detecting positive growth autocorrelation without marking individuals.

Authors:  Mollie E Brooks; Michael W McCoy; Benjamin M Bolker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Body size variation in aquatic consumers causes pervasive community effects, independent of mean body size.

Authors:  Bradley E Carlson; Tracy Langkilde
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-10-22       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Is bigger really better? Relative and absolute body size influence individual growth rate under competition.

Authors:  Josh Van Buskirk; Eva Cereghetti; Julia S Hess
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  The effects of protected areas on the ecological niches of birds and mammals.

Authors:  Andrea Santangeli; Stefano Mammola; Aleksi Lehikoinen; Ari Rajasärkkä; Andreas Lindén; Marjo Saastamoinen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 4.996

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.