BACKGROUND: Social relationships are reliably related to rates of morbidity and mortality. One pathway by which social relationships may influence health is via the impact of relationship quality on cardiovascular reactivity during social interactions. PURPOSE AND METHOD: This study examined the effects of the quality of a friendship on cardiovascular reactivity when speaking about positive or negative life events with an ambivalent or supportive friend. To examine this, 107 healthy male and female adults (and their same-sex friend) were recruited. RESULTS: Results revealed that participants exhibited the greatest levels of systolic blood pressure reactivity when discussing a negative event with an ambivalent friend compared to a supportive friend. We also found higher resting levels of heart rate and lower respiratory sinus arrhythmia among those who brought in ambivalent friends than those who brought in supportive friends. CONCLUSION: Individuals may not be able to fully relax in the presence of ambivalent friends and may not benefit from support during stress. This research may help clarify the health-related consequences of differing types of social relationships.
BACKGROUND: Social relationships are reliably related to rates of morbidity and mortality. One pathway by which social relationships may influence health is via the impact of relationship quality on cardiovascular reactivity during social interactions. PURPOSE AND METHOD: This study examined the effects of the quality of a friendship on cardiovascular reactivity when speaking about positive or negative life events with an ambivalent or supportive friend. To examine this, 107 healthy male and female adults (and their same-sex friend) were recruited. RESULTS: Results revealed that participants exhibited the greatest levels of systolic blood pressure reactivity when discussing a negative event with an ambivalent friend compared to a supportive friend. We also found higher resting levels of heart rate and lower respiratory sinus arrhythmia among those who brought in ambivalent friends than those who brought in supportive friends. CONCLUSION: Individuals may not be able to fully relax in the presence of ambivalent friends and may not benefit from support during stress. This research may help clarify the health-related consequences of differing types of social relationships.
Authors: Luci A Martin; Joseph W Critelli; Joseph A Doster; Catherine Powers; Michael Purdum; Meagen R Doster; Paul L Lambert Journal: Int J Behav Med Date: 2013-03
Authors: Joan K Monin; Andrew Manigault; Becca R Levy; Richard Schulz; Ajua Duker; Margaret S Clark; Peter H Van Ness; Trace Kershaw Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2019-08-12 Impact factor: 4.267
Authors: Raphael M Herr; Frenk Van Harreveld; Bert N Uchino; Wendy C Birmingham; Adrian Loerbroks; Joachim E Fischer; Jos A Bosch Journal: J Behav Med Date: 2018-10-26