OBJECTIVES: We synthesized evidence regarding effective strategies for smoking cessation among employed or unemployed young adults aged 18 to 24 years. METHODS: For this knowledge synthesis, we used (1) a systematic review of the scientific literature, (2) a Delphi panel of experts, and (3) 6 focus groups of employed and unemployed young adult smokers. RESULTS: Of 51 related studies, only 4 included employed and unemployed young adults in their samples (as opposed to students), and none focused solely on them. Using the Delphi process, 27 experts reached consensus on priorities for research, practice, and policy, emphasizing population engagement, recruitment, and innovative interventions. Key themes from focus groups were that interventions should be relevant to young adults, individual choice should be respected, and the positive aspects of quitting should be stressed. Despite having negative views on traditional smoking cessation methods, participants expressed optimism about being able to quit and proposed creative recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings set an agenda for targeting research, improving practice, and informing policy for smoking cessation among young adults. We also demonstrate the value of using 3 complementary approaches: literature review, expert opinion, and target population perspectives.
OBJECTIVES: We synthesized evidence regarding effective strategies for smoking cessation among employed or unemployed young adults aged 18 to 24 years. METHODS: For this knowledge synthesis, we used (1) a systematic review of the scientific literature, (2) a Delphi panel of experts, and (3) 6 focus groups of employed and unemployed young adult smokers. RESULTS: Of 51 related studies, only 4 included employed and unemployed young adults in their samples (as opposed to students), and none focused solely on them. Using the Delphi process, 27 experts reached consensus on priorities for research, practice, and policy, emphasizing population engagement, recruitment, and innovative interventions. Key themes from focus groups were that interventions should be relevant to young adults, individual choice should be respected, and the positive aspects of quitting should be stressed. Despite having negative views on traditional smoking cessation methods, participants expressed optimism about being able to quit and proposed creative recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings set an agenda for targeting research, improving practice, and informing policy for smoking cessation among young adults. We also demonstrate the value of using 3 complementary approaches: literature review, expert opinion, and target population perspectives.
Authors: Patrick J Hammett; Steven S Fu; Diana J Burgess; David Nelson; Barbara Clothier; Jessie E Saul; John A Nyman; Rachel Widome; Anne M Joseph Journal: Am J Manag Care Date: 2017-09-01 Impact factor: 2.229
Authors: Kari Jo Harris; Delwyn Catley; Glenn E Good; Nikole J Cronk; Solomon Harrar; Karen B Williams Journal: Prev Med Date: 2010-09-07 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Michele L Ybarra; Jodi Summers Holtrop; Tonya L Prescott; Mohammad H Rahbar; David Strong Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2013-01-24 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Neill Bruce Baskerville; Laura Louise Struik; David Hammond; G Emmanuel Guindon; Cameron D Norman; Robyn Whittaker; Catherine M Burns; Kelly A Grindrod; K Stephen Brown Journal: JMIR Res Protoc Date: 2015-01-19
Authors: Stephanie Diepeveen; Tom Ling; Marc Suhrcke; Martin Roland; Theresa M Marteau Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2013-08-15 Impact factor: 3.295