Literature DB >> 17599271

Differences and similarities in men's and women's sexual self-schemas.

Darryl B Hill1.   

Abstract

In the last 10 years, researchers have developed separate rating scales for men and women that purport to measure a person's thoughts about their sexual self or sexual self-schema. While these scales are promising, there are some problems intrinsic to these measures. This study addresses these concerns and tests a combined measure for use among both men and women, while retaining internal consistency and a factor structure similar to the women's scale. Having both men and women complete the same scale permitted a comparison of how men and women think about their sexual selves. In this study, gender differences netted a small effect, with men scoring lower on both the loving/warmth and reserved/conservative factors compared to women. Results are discussed in terms of future research with this new scale and the meaning of gender differences along these dimensions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17599271     DOI: 10.1080/00224490701263611

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sex Res        ISSN: 0022-4499


  4 in total

1.  Sexual self-schemas, sexual dysfunction, and the sexual responses of women with a history of childhood sexual abuse.

Authors:  Alessandra H Rellini; Cindy M Meston
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2010-12-08

2.  Correlates of African American Men's Sexual Schemas.

Authors:  Naomi M Hall; Dawn A Morales; Tamera Coyne-Beasley; Janet St Lawrence
Journal:  Sex Roles       Date:  2012-12

3.  Sexual Self-Schema Scale for Women-Validation and Psychometric Properties of the Polish Version.

Authors:  Krzysztof Nowosielski; Konrad S Jankowski; Robert Kowalczyk; Jacek Kurpisz; Małgorzata Normantowicz-Zakrzewska; Aleksandra Krasowska
Journal:  Sex Med       Date:  2018-02-17       Impact factor: 2.491

4.  A randomized controlled trial of an Internet-based emotion regulation intervention for sexual health: study protocol.

Authors:  Vinicius Jobim Fischer; Gerhard Andersson; Joël Billieux; Claus Vögele
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2021-10-15       Impact factor: 2.279

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.