Literature DB >> 17598751

Evolutionary adaptation to environmental pH in experimental lineages of Escherichia coli.

Bradley S Hughes1, Alistair J Cullum, Albert F Bennett.   

Abstract

This study uses the enteric bacterium Escherichia coli as an experimental system to examine evolutionary responses of bacteria to an environmental acidic-alkaline range between pH 5.3 and 7.8 (15-5000 nM [H(+)]). Our goal was both to test general hypotheses about adaptation to abiotic variables and to provide insights into how coliform organisms might respond to changing conditions inside and outside of hosts. Six replicate lines of E. coli evolved for 2000 generations at one of four different constant pH conditions: pH 5.3, 6.3, 7.0, or 7.8. Direct adaptation to the evolutionary environment, as well as correlated changes in other environments, was measured as a change in fitness relative to the ancestor in direct competition experiments. The pH 5.3 group had the highest fitness gains, with a highly significant increase of 20%. The pH 7.8 group had far less significant gains and much higher variance among its lines. Analysis of individual lines within these two groups revealed complex patterns of adaptation: all of the pH 5.3 lines exhibited trade-offs (reduced fitness in another environment), but only 33% of the pH 7.8 lines showed such trade-offs and one of the pH 7.8 lines demonstrated exaptation by improving fitness in the pH 5.3 environment. Although there was also prevalent exaptation in other groups to the acidic environment, there were no such cases of exaptation to alkalinity. Comparison across the entire experimental pH range revealed that the most acidic lines, the pH 5.3 group, were all specialists, in contrast to the pH 6.3 lines, which were almost all generalists. That is, although none of the pH 5.3 lines showed any correlated fitness gains, all of the pH 6.3 lines did.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17598751     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00139.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  22 in total

1.  Why are not all chilies hot? A trade-off limits pungency.

Authors:  David C Haak; Leslie A McGinnis; Douglas J Levey; Joshua J Tewksbury
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  New insights into bacterial adaptation through in vivo and in silico experimental evolution.

Authors:  Thomas Hindré; Carole Knibbe; Guillaume Beslon; Dominique Schneider
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 60.633

3.  Expanding the Limits of Thermoacidophily in the Archaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus by Adaptive Evolution.

Authors:  Samuel McCarthy; Tyler Johnson; Benjamin J Pavlik; Sophie Payne; Wendy Schackwitz; Joel Martin; Anna Lipzen; Erica Keffeler; Paul Blum
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  The genetic basis of phenotypic adaptation II: the distribution of adaptive substitutions in the moving optimum model.

Authors:  Michael Kopp; Joachim Hermisson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-10-05       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Repeated Exposure of Aspergillus niger Spores to the Antifungal Bacterium Collimonas fungivorans Ter331 Selects for Delayed Spore Germination.

Authors:  Sandra Mosquera; Johan H J Leveau; Ioannis Stergiopoulos
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 6.  Experimental Design, Population Dynamics, and Diversity in Microbial Experimental Evolution.

Authors:  Bram Van den Bergh; Toon Swings; Maarten Fauvart; Jan Michiels
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 11.056

7.  Adaptation and heterogeneity of Escherichia coli MC1000 growing in complex environments.

Authors:  Pilar Eliana Puentes-Téllez; Martin Asser Hansen; Søren Johannes Sørensen; Jan Dirk van Elsas
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 8.  Phenotypic plasticity in evolutionary rescue experiments.

Authors:  Luis-Miguel Chevin; Romain Gallet; Richard Gomulkiewicz; Robert D Holt; Simon Fellous
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 9.  Constraints, Trade-offs and the Currency of Fitness.

Authors:  Luis Acerenza
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 2.395

10.  Benzoate- and Salicylate-Tolerant Strains of Escherichia coli K-12 Lose Antibiotic Resistance during Laboratory Evolution.

Authors:  Kaitlin E Creamer; Frederick S Ditmars; Preston J Basting; Karina S Kunka; Issam N Hamdallah; Sean P Bush; Zachary Scott; Amanda He; Stephanie R Penix; Alexandra S Gonzales; Elizabeth K Eder; Dominic W Camperchioli; Adama Berndt; Michelle W Clark; Kerry A Rouhier; Joan L Slonczewski
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2016-12-30       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.