Literature DB >> 17598494

Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty in a Chinese population.

Tak-Chuen Wong1, Baldwin Chan, Dicky Lam.   

Abstract

From April 2003 to April 2004, the records of 24 patients who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) through an anterolateral mini-incision technique (MIS group) were reviewed. They were matched by diagnosis, gender, average age, and body-mass index to those with a traditional-incision technique (control group). The clinical significances in terms of operative time, blood loss, pain level and length of stay were compared. Mean patient age in the MIS group (12 patients) was 56 years; 9 patients were women. Average body mass index was 24.6. Mean operative time was 113 minutes. Average incision length was 8.3 cm for the initial incision. Fifty percent required extension of the incision length, which became 9 cm after wound closure. Mean length of hospital stay was 11 days. Average intraoperative blood loss was 504.2 mL and postoperative drain output was 491.7 mL. Average blood transfusion was 0.8 units. Ninety-two percent of patients required only one oral analgesic for pain control. Mean visual acuity score (VAS) was 1.8 on postoperative day 3. When compared with the control group (average incision length of 15), statistically significant differences (P < .05) were noted in terms of intraoperative blood loss, length of stay, and VAS. Anterolateral mini-incision technique for primary THA is a safe method without ignificant complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17598494     DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20070601-08

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopedics        ISSN: 0147-7447            Impact factor:   1.390


  5 in total

1.  [Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty - trend or state of the art?: A meta-analysis].

Authors:  T Kappe; R Bieger; D Wernerus; H Reichel
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Is limited incision better than standard total hip arthroplasty? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Joseph T Moskal; Susan G Capps
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Minimally invasive hip surgery: the approach did not make the difference.

Authors:  J R Varela-Egocheaga; M A Suárez-Suárez; M Fernández-Villán; V González-Sastre; J R Varela-Gómez; A Murcia-Mazón
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2011-12-03

Review 4.  Factors influencing the outcomes of minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  Filippo Migliorini; Andrea Pintore; Joerg Eschweiler; Francesco Oliva; Frank Hildebrand; Nicola Maffulli
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 2.677

Review 5.  Mini-incision versus standard incision total hip arthroplasty regarding surgical outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Chang-Peng Xu; Xue Li; Jin-Qi Song; Zhuang Cui; Bin Yu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.