OBJECTIVE: Patient switching of prescription drug brands within a therapeutic class has become more prevalent with tiered drug plan formularies. Although switching from more expensive brand name drugs to generic equivalents may reduce aggregate prescription costs, therapeutic benefit may be compromised if the patient is not switched to a drug with an equivalent therapeutic profile. This study examined whether patients switching from branded atorvastatin to either a branded or generic simvastatin were prescribed a therapeutically equivalent or higher dose, as opposed to a lower therapeutic dose. METHODS: Study patients were selected from a national longitudinal database of 1.4 billion annual prescription drug claims. All patients active in the database during the study period (9/01/2005 to 9/30/2006) with a prescription drug claim for atorvastatin in the index month (9/2005) were selected. The 453,409 patients in the study period were followed for 12 months to determine the percent switching to simvastatin and their relative therapeutic doses after switching. Patients switching to the same or lower milligram dose of simvastatin were classified as receiving a lower therapeutic dose compared with their atorvastatin dosing. RESULTS: Among patients using atorvastatin at the beginning of the study, 13,530 (3%) switched to simvastatin by the end of the study period. Medication changes resulted in a lower therapeutic dose in 38% of the switches. The percent of switches resulting in a lower therapeutic dose were 18% for those switching from 10 mg, 43% for those switching from 20 mg, 73% for those switching from 40 mg, and 100% for those switching from 80 mg. CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of patients switching from atorvastatin to simvastatin received a lower therapeutic dose, which may have an adverse impact on patients' quality of care and health status. Further research is needed to assess the potential negative effect on patient outcomes.
OBJECTIVE:Patient switching of prescription drug brands within a therapeutic class has become more prevalent with tiered drug plan formularies. Although switching from more expensive brand name drugs to generic equivalents may reduce aggregate prescription costs, therapeutic benefit may be compromised if the patient is not switched to a drug with an equivalent therapeutic profile. This study examined whether patients switching from branded atorvastatin to either a branded or generic simvastatin were prescribed a therapeutically equivalent or higher dose, as opposed to a lower therapeutic dose. METHODS: Study patients were selected from a national longitudinal database of 1.4 billion annual prescription drug claims. All patients active in the database during the study period (9/01/2005 to 9/30/2006) with a prescription drug claim for atorvastatin in the index month (9/2005) were selected. The 453,409 patients in the study period were followed for 12 months to determine the percent switching to simvastatin and their relative therapeutic doses after switching. Patients switching to the same or lower milligram dose of simvastatin were classified as receiving a lower therapeutic dose compared with their atorvastatin dosing. RESULTS: Among patients using atorvastatin at the beginning of the study, 13,530 (3%) switched to simvastatin by the end of the study period. Medication changes resulted in a lower therapeutic dose in 38% of the switches. The percent of switches resulting in a lower therapeutic dose were 18% for those switching from 10 mg, 43% for those switching from 20 mg, 73% for those switching from 40 mg, and 100% for those switching from 80 mg. CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of patients switching from atorvastatin to simvastatin received a lower therapeutic dose, which may have an adverse impact on patients' quality of care and health status. Further research is needed to assess the potential negative effect on patient outcomes.
Authors: Christine Y Lu; Michael R Law; Stephen B Soumerai; Amy Johnson Graves; Robert F LeCates; Fang Zhang; Dennis Ross-Degnan; Alyce S Adams Journal: Clin Ther Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 3.393
Authors: Richard M Turner; Peng Yin; Anita Hanson; Richard FitzGerald; Andrew P Morris; Rod H Stables; Andrea L Jorgensen; Munir Pirmohamed Journal: J Clin Lipidol Date: 2016-12-28 Impact factor: 4.766
Authors: Markus G Pruszydlo; Stefanie U Walk-Fritz; Torsten Hoppe-Tichy; Jens Kaltschmidt; Walter E Haefeli Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Date: 2012-11-27 Impact factor: 2.796