BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that increasing obesity levels in young women lead to intrauterine environments that, in turn, stimulate increased obesity among their offspring, generating an intergenerational acceleration of obesity levels. If this mechanism is important, the association of maternal body mass index (BMI) with offspring BMI should be stronger than the association of paternal with offspring BMI. OBJECTIVE: To compare the relative strengths of association of maternal and paternal BMI with offspring BMI at age 7.5, taking into account the possible effect of non-paternity. METHODS: We compared strength of association for maternal-offspring and paternal-offspring BMI for 4654 complete parent-offspring trios in the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC), using unstandardised and standardised regression analysis. We carried out a sensitivity analysis to investigate the influence of non-paternity on these associations. RESULTS: The strength of association between parental BMI and offspring BMI at age 7.5 was similar for both parents. Taking into account correlations between maternal and paternal BMI, performing standardised rather than unstandardised regression and carrying out a sensitivity analysis for non-paternity emphasised the robustness of the general similarity of the associations. The associations between high parental BMI (top decile) and offspring BMI are also similar for both parents. CONCLUSION: Comparison of mother-offspring and father-offspring associations for BMI suggests that intergenerational acceleration mechanisms do not make an important contribution to levels of childhood BMI within the population. Associations at later ages and for different components of body composition now require study.
BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that increasing obesity levels in young women lead to intrauterine environments that, in turn, stimulate increased obesity among their offspring, generating an intergenerational acceleration of obesity levels. If this mechanism is important, the association of maternal body mass index (BMI) with offspring BMI should be stronger than the association of paternal with offspring BMI. OBJECTIVE: To compare the relative strengths of association of maternal and paternal BMI with offspring BMI at age 7.5, taking into account the possible effect of non-paternity. METHODS: We compared strength of association for maternal-offspring and paternal-offspring BMI for 4654 complete parent-offspring trios in the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC), using unstandardised and standardised regression analysis. We carried out a sensitivity analysis to investigate the influence of non-paternity on these associations. RESULTS: The strength of association between parental BMI and offspring BMI at age 7.5 was similar for both parents. Taking into account correlations between maternal and paternal BMI, performing standardised rather than unstandardised regression and carrying out a sensitivity analysis for non-paternity emphasised the robustness of the general similarity of the associations. The associations between high parental BMI (top decile) and offspring BMI are also similar for both parents. CONCLUSION: Comparison of mother-offspring and father-offspring associations for BMI suggests that intergenerational acceleration mechanisms do not make an important contribution to levels of childhood BMI within the population. Associations at later ages and for different components of body composition now require study.
Authors: A Esposito-Del Puente; L Scalfi; E De Filippo; M R Peri; A Caldara; G Caso; F Contaldo; G Valerio; A Franzese; S Di Maio Journal: Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord Date: 1994-09
Authors: Paul C D Johnson; Jennifer Logue; Alex McConnachie; Niveen M E Abu-Rmeileh; Carole Hart; Mark N Upton; Mike Lean; Naveed Sattar; Graham Watt Journal: Eur J Epidemiol Date: 2011-12-21 Impact factor: 8.082
Authors: Kathryn V Dalrymple; John M D Thompson; Shahina Begum; Keith M Godfrey; Lucilla Poston; Paul T Seed; Lesley M E McCowan; Clare Wall; Andrew Shelling; Robyn North; Wayne S Cutfield; Edwin A Mitchell Journal: Pediatr Obes Date: 2019-06-24 Impact factor: 4.000
Authors: Jeremiah R Garza; Edna Acosta Pérez; Michael Prelip; William J McCarthy; Jonathan M Feldman; Glorisa Canino; Alexander N Ortega Journal: Ethn Dis Date: 2011 Impact factor: 1.847
Authors: Emily J McAllister; Nikhil V Dhurandhar; Scott W Keith; Louis J Aronne; Jamie Barger; Monica Baskin; Ruth M Benca; Joseph Biggio; Mary M Boggiano; Joe C Eisenmann; Mai Elobeid; Kevin R Fontaine; Peter Gluckman; Erin C Hanlon; Peter Katzmarzyk; Angelo Pietrobelli; David T Redden; Douglas M Ruden; Chenxi Wang; Robert A Waterland; Suzanne M Wright; David B Allison Journal: Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 11.176
Authors: Robert S Lindsay; Scott M Nelson; James D Walker; Stephen A Greene; Gillian Milne; Naveed Sattar; Donald W Pearson Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Idoia Labayen; Jonatan R Ruiz; Francisco B Ortega; Helle-Mai Loit; Jaanus Harro; Toomas Veidebaum; Michael Sjöström Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2010-01-07 Impact factor: 19.112