Literature DB >> 17594202

Institutional experience with voriconazole compared with liposomal amphotericin B as empiric therapy for febrile neutropenia.

Nadine Shehab1, Daryl D DePestel, Emily R Mackler, Curtis D Collins, Kathleen Welch, Harry P Erba.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness, safety, and cost of empiric treatment of febrile neutropenia before and after implementing an algorithm in which voriconazole was substituted for liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB).
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort analysis.
SETTING: An 850-bed tertiary care hospital, which is also a referral site for patients with acute leukemia. PATIENTS: Fifty-five adult patients who started empiric antifungal therapy for febrile neutropenia between January 1, 2002, and December 31, 2003, encompassing 58 treatment episodes (defined as a hospitalization during which empiric antifungal therapy was administered).
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Medical charts, including patients' pharmacy and laboratory data, were reviewed. Twenty-six and 32 episodes of L-AmB and voriconazole use, respectively, were identified. No significant differences between the L-AmB and voriconazole groups were noted at baseline. Rates of fever resolution (54% vs 59%, p=0.791) and breakthrough invasive fungal infections (11% vs 12%, p>0.999) were similar for the L-AmB and voriconazole episodes. Premature drug discontinuation due to the prescriber's perceived lack of efficacy occurred most frequently in the voriconazole group (25% vs 8%, p=0.160). Survival was significantly higher in the voriconazole than in the L-AmB group (100% vs 77%, p=0.006). Adverse effects that were significantly more common in the L-AmB group than in the voriconazole group were elevated serum creatinine levels (27% vs 3%, p=0.017) and electrolyte disturbances (19% vs 0%, p=0.014). Adverse effects reported more frequently in the voriconazole group than in the L-AmB group were visual disturbances (9% vs 0%, p=0.245) and elevated hepatic enzyme levels (9% vs 8%, p>0.999). Mean drug expenditures/episode for initial empiric antifungal therapy were lower for voriconazole than for L-AmB ($1593 vs $4144, or $153 vs $380/day).
CONCLUSION: Our institution's algorithm incorporating voriconazole into the empiric management of febrile neutropenia was associated with effectiveness outcomes comparable to those observed with L-AmB as well as a lower frequency of adverse effects and overall expenditures for antifungal drugs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17594202     DOI: 10.1592/phco.27.7.970

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacotherapy        ISSN: 0277-0008            Impact factor:   4.705


  1 in total

1.  Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of voriconazole vs. liposomal amphotericin B in empiric treatment of invasive fungal infections in Turkey.

Authors:  Stuart J Turner; Esin Senol; Ates Kara; Daoud Al-Badriyeh; Ener C Dinleyici; David Cm Kong
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 3.090

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.