Literature DB >> 17592284

The effect of antireflux surgery on esophageal carcinogenesis in patients with barrett esophagus: a systematic review.

Eugene Y Chang1, Cynthia D Morris, Ann K Seltman, Robert W O'Rourke, Benjamin K Chan, John G Hunter, Blair A Jobe.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether patients with Barrett esophagus who undergo antireflux surgery differ from medically treated patients in incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma and probability of disease regression/progression. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Barrett esophagus is a risk factor for the development of esophageal adenocarcinoma. A question exists as to whether antireflux surgery reduces this risk.
METHODS: Query of PubMed (1966 through October 2005) using predetermined search terms revealed 2011 abstracts, of which 100 full-text articles were reviewed. Twenty-five articles met selection criteria. A review of article references and consultation with experts revealed additional articles for inclusion. Studies that enrolled adults with biopsy-proven Barrett esophagus, specified treatment-type rendered, followed up patients with endoscopic biopsies no less than12 months of instituting therapy, and provided adequate extractable data. The incidence of adenocarcinoma and the proportion of patients developing progression or regression of Barrett esophagus and/or dysplasia were extracted.
RESULTS: In surgical and medical groups, 700 and 996 patients were followed for a total of 2939 and 3711 patient-years, respectively. The incidence rate of esophageal adenocarcinoma was 2.8 (95% confidence interval, 1.2-5.3) per 1000 patient-years among surgically treated patients and 6.3 (3.6-10.1) among medically treated patients (P = 0.034). Heterogeneity in incidence rates in surgically treated patients was observed between controlled studies and case series (P = 0.014). Among controlled studies, incidence rates were 4.8 (1.7-11.1) and 6.5 (2.6-13.8) per 1000 patient-years in surgical and medical patients, respectively (P = 0.320). Probability of progression was 2.9% (1.2-5.5) in surgical patients and 6.8% (2.6-12.1) in medical patients (P = 0.054). Probability of regression was 15.4% (6.1-31.4) in surgical patients and 1.9% (0.4-7.3) in medical patients (P = 0.004).
CONCLUSIONS: Antireflux surgery is associated with regression of Barrett esophagus and/or dysplasia. However, evidence suggesting that surgery reduces the incidence of adenocarcinoma is largely driven by uncontrolled studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17592284      PMCID: PMC1899200          DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000261459.10565.e9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  115 in total

1.  Long-term results of a randomized prospective study comparing medical and surgical treatment of Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Pascual Parrilla; Luisa F Martínez de Haro; Angeles Ortiz; Vicente Munitiz; Joaquín Molina; Juan Bermejo; Manuel Canteras
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Updated guidelines for the diagnosis, surveillance, and therapy of Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Richard E Sampliner
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Dysplasia and adenocarcinoma after classic antireflux surgery in patients with Barrett's esophagus: the need for long-term subjective and objective follow-up.

Authors:  Attila Csendes; Patricio Burdiles; Italo Braghetto; Gladys Smok; Cesar Castro; Owen Korn; Ana Henríquez
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Risk of adenocarcinomas of the esophagus and gastric cardia in patients with gastroesophageal reflux diseases and after antireflux surgery.

Authors:  W Ye; W H Chow; J Lagergren; L Yin; O Nyrén
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Clinical, endoscopic, and functional studies in 408 patients with Barrett's esophagus, compared to 174 cases of intestinal metaplasia of the cardia.

Authors:  Attila Csendes; Gladys Smok; Juan Quiroz; Patricio Burdiles; Jorge Rojas; César Castro; Ana Henríquez
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 10.864

6.  Formal training in advanced surgical technologies enhances the surgical residency.

Authors:  Robert C G Martin; Farid J Kehdy; Jeff W Allen
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 7.  Dysplasia arising in barrett's esophagus: diagnostic pitfalls and natural history.

Authors:  John R Goldblum; Gregory Y Lauwers
Journal:  Semin Diagn Pathol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.464

8.  Clinical and histologic follow-up after antireflux surgery for Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Steven P Bowers; Samer G Mattar; C Daniel Smith; J Patrick Waring; John G Hunter
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 9.  Impact of antireflux surgery on Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Christian A Gutschow; Wolfgang Schröder; Klaus Prenzel; Elfriede Bollschweiler; Renato Romagnoli; Jean-Marie Collard; Arnulf H Hölscher
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2002-07-09       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 10.  Impact of antireflux operation on columnar-lined esophagus.

Authors:  Jean-Yves Mabrut; Jacques Baulieux; Mustapha Adham; Eric De La Roche; Jean-Louis Gaudin; Jean-Christophe Souquet; Christian Ducerf
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 6.113

View more
  48 in total

Review 1.  Barrett's esophagus with high-grade dysplasia: focus on current treatment options.

Authors:  Leonidas Lekakos; Nikolaos P Karidis; Dimitrios Dimitroulis; Christos Tsigris; Gregory Kouraklis; Nikolaos Nikiteas
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Guidelines for surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Dimitrios Stefanidis; William W Hope; Geoffrey P Kohn; Patrick R Reardon; William S Richardson; Robert D Fanelli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  [No cancer prevention with fundoplication : Results of a population-based study in Sweden].

Authors:  B H A von Rahden; C T Germer
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  Esophageal pH profile following laparoscopic total fundoplication compared to anterior fundoplication.

Authors:  Andrew S Y Wong; Jennifer C Myers; Glyn G Jamieson
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-02-26       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  MicroRNA-143 and -205 expression in neosquamous esophageal epithelium following Argon plasma ablation of Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Willem A Dijckmeester; Bas P L Wijnhoven; David I Watson; Mary P Leong; Michael Z Michael; George C Mayne; Tim Bright; David Astill; Damian J Hussey
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-02-04       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Reflux, Barrett's, and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus: can we disrupt the pathway?

Authors:  Steven R DeMeester
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Endoscopic evaluation of laparoscopic nissen fundoplication: 89 % success rate 10 years after surgery.

Authors:  Perttu Neuvonen; Mauri Iivonen; Tuomo Rantanen
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  The impact of laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery in patients with Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Ellen Morrow; Daniel Bushyhead; Eelco Wassenaar; Marcelo Hinojosa; Maximiliano Loviscek; Carlos Pellegrini; Brant Oelschlager
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  Antireflux surgery for dysplastic Barrett.

Authors:  Marco E Allaix; Marco G Patti
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 10.  Reflux esophagitis, high-grade neoplasia, and early Barrett's carcinoma-what is the place of the Merendino procedure?

Authors:  A H Hölscher; D Vallböhmer; C Gutschow; E Bollschweiler
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 3.445

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.