Literature DB >> 17592273

Proposal of progression model for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: clinicopathologic differences between hilar type and peripheral type.

Shinichi Aishima1, Yousuke Kuroda, Yunosuke Nishihara, Tomohiro Iguchi, Kenichi Taguchi, Akinobu Taketomi, Yoshihiko Maehara, Masazumi Tsuneyoshi.   

Abstract

It is important to clarify the histologic progression of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) in consideration of its origin from the intrahepatic large or small biliary ducts. On the basis of the gross and histologic assessment, we classified 87 cases of ICC smaller than 5 cm in diameter into hilar type (H-ICC, n=38) or peripheral type (P-ICC, n=49) to compare their clinical and histologic features. Biliary dysplasia was observed in 65.8% (25/38) of H-ICC cases, whereas hepatitis virus infection and liver cirrhosis were associated with 46.7% (21/45) and 28.6% (14/49) of P-ICC, respectively. The frequency of perineural invasion, lymph node metastasis, and extrahepatic recurrence of H-ICC was significantly higher than that of P-ICC (P<0.0001, 0.0106, and 0.0279, respectively). H-ICC cases showed frequent vascular invasion and intrahepatic metastasis even with small tumor size, compared with P-ICC cases. H-ICC showed large duct involvement within the tumor, and in the cases of large tumor size, intraductal spread was detected in the tumor periphery. P-ICC of small size contained preserved architecture of the portal tracts. The survival of patients with H-ICC was worse than that of patients with P-ICC (P=0.0121). The independent and best prognostic factor by multivariate analysis was intrahepatic metastasis for H-ICC and lymph node metastasis for P-ICC. Our results suggest that ICCs derived from a different level of biliary ducts were related to different premalignant conditions and different tumor progression. Some ICCs arising from the large biliary duct are likely to exhibit an aggressive course even in cases of small tumor size. The recognition of the above events induces the proper therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17592273     DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e31802b34b6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  40 in total

1.  Multiple cells of origin in cholangiocarcinoma underlie biological, epidemiological and clinical heterogeneity.

Authors:  Vincenzo Cardinale; Guido Carpino; Lola Reid; Eugenio Gaudio; Domenico Alvaro
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2012-05-15

Review 2.  Cholangiocarcinoma 2020: the next horizon in mechanisms and management.

Authors:  Jesus M Banales; Jose J G Marin; Angela Lamarca; Pedro M Rodrigues; Shahid A Khan; Lewis R Roberts; Vincenzo Cardinale; Guido Carpino; Jesper B Andersen; Chiara Braconi; Diego F Calvisi; Maria J Perugorria; Luca Fabris; Luke Boulter; Rocio I R Macias; Eugenio Gaudio; Domenico Alvaro; Sergio A Gradilone; Mario Strazzabosco; Marco Marzioni; Cédric Coulouarn; Laura Fouassier; Chiara Raggi; Pietro Invernizzi; Joachim C Mertens; Anja Moncsek; Sumera Rizvi; Julie Heimbach; Bas Groot Koerkamp; Jordi Bruix; Alejandro Forner; John Bridgewater; Juan W Valle; Gregory J Gores
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 46.802

3.  Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: clinicopathological differences between peripheral type and hilar type.

Authors:  Yoshiaki Murakami; Kenichiro Uemura; Takeshi Sudo; Yasushi Hashimoto; Akira Nakashima; Taijiro Sueda
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Enhancement patterns in the arterial phase of dynamic hepatic CT - Correlation with clinicopathological findings.

Authors:  Nobuhiro Fujita; Yoshiki Asayama; Akihiro Nishie; Kousei Ishigami; Yasuhiro Ushijima; Yukihisa Takayama; Daisuke Okamoto; Koichiro Moirta; Ken Shirabe; Shinichi Aishima; Huanlin Wang; Yoshinao Oda; Hiroshi Honda
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  A proposal of imaging classification of intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma into ductal and parenchymal types: clinicopathologic significance.

Authors:  Hyungjin Rhee; Myeong-Jin Kim; Young Nyun Park; Chansik An
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  A simple and effective prognostic staging system based on clinicopathologic features of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Huabang Zhou; Xiaolan Jiang; Qiaomei Li; Jingyi Hu; Zhengrong Zhong; Hao Wang; Hui Wang; Bing Yang; Heping Hu
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 6.166

7.  Differentiation of two subtypes of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: imaging approach.

Authors:  Kengo Yoshimitsu
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Impact of tumor localization on the outcomes of surgery for an intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Tatsuya Orimo; Toshiya Kamiyama; Tomoko Mitsuhashi; Hirofumi Kamachi; Hideki Yokoo; Kenji Wakayama; Shingo Shimada; Akihisa Nagatsu; Akinobu Taketomi
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 7.527

Review 9.  Early detection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Mami Hamaoka; Kazuto Kozaka; Osamu Matsui; Takahiro Komori; Takashi Matsubara; Norihide Yoneda; Kotaro Yoshida; Dai Inoue; Azusa Kitao; Wataru Koda; Toshifumi Gabata; Satoshi Kobayashi
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 2.374

Review 10.  Pathological diagnosis of flat epithelial lesions of the biliary tract with emphasis on biliary intraepithelial neoplasia.

Authors:  Yasunori Sato; Motoko Sasaki; Kenichi Harada; Shinichi Aishima; Toshio Fukusato; Hidenori Ojima; Yae Kanai; Masayoshi Kage; Yasuni Nakanuma; Hirohito Tsubouchi
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 7.527

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.