Literature DB >> 17592263

Clinicopathologic analysis of 187 high-grade endometrial carcinomas of different histologic subtypes: similar outcomes belie distinctive biologic differences.

Robert A Soslow1, John P Bissonnette, Andrew Wilton, Sarah E Ferguson, Kaled M Alektiar, Linda R Duska, Esther Oliva.   

Abstract

The clinical and histopathologic features of 187 high-grade endometrial cancers [FIGO grade 3 endometrioid (EC-3), serous (SC), and clear cell (CC)] were studied to determine whether clinicopathologic differences between these various histologic subtypes existed. The study group consisted of 89 EC-3s, 61 SCs, and 37 CCs. Treatment regimens were individualized. SCs and CCs were significantly more likely than EC-3s to occur in patients older than 65 years (P=0.03), and SCs tended to occur more frequently in patients of African descent than EC-3s and CCs (P=0.07), although this was not statistically significant. EC-3s had the highest rate of associated endometrial hyperplasia (P=0.05). SCs were most likely to have high-stage disease at presentation (>or=stage IIB; P=0.01), with peritoneal dissemination at diagnosis being much more common compared with EC-3s and CCs (P=0.004). Median follow-up was 39 months, and median overall survival was 47 months. Five-year survivals were 45% (EC-3), 36% (SC), and 50% (CC)-differences that were not statistically significant. In contrast, the impact of stage on survival was significant (P<0.001). Among all other factors evaluated, only age greater than 65 years was a negative predictor (risk ratio, 2.23; P<0.001), whereas a family history of cancer reduced the risk of death when controlling for stage (risk ratio, 0.54; P=0.005). When controlling for stage, race, reproductive history, personal history of cancer, histologic subtype, depth of myometrial invasion, lymphovascular invasion, presence of an endometrial polyp, presence of hyperplasia, or staging adequacy did not affect prognosis. High-grade endometrial cancers of different histologic subtypes treated in an individualized manner are associated with similar clinical outcomes, but differences in age at presentation, race distribution, association with hyperplasia, stage, and sites of tumor dissemination support the idea that these represent distinct disease entities as defined by traditional histopathologic classification of endometrial cancers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17592263     DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e31802ee494

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  35 in total

1.  Prognostic factors in stages II/III/IV and stages III/IV endometrioid and serous adenocarcinoma of the endometrium.

Authors:  P Mhawech-Fauceglia; R F Herrmann; J Kesterson; I Izevbaye; S Lele; K Odunsi
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.424

2.  Redefining stage I endometrial cancer: incorporating histology, a binary grading system, myometrial invasion, and lymph node assessment.

Authors:  Joyce N Barlin; Robert A Soslow; Megan Lutz; Qin C Zhou; Caryn M St Clair; Mario M Leitao; Alexia Iasonos; Martee L Hensley; Richard R Barakat; Xavier Matias-Guiu; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.437

3.  Factors associated with Type I and Type II endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Ashley S Felix; Joel L Weissfeld; Roslyn A Stone; Robert Bowser; Mamatha Chivukula; Robert P Edwards; Faina Linkov
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 2.506

Review 4.  The evolution of endometrial carcinoma classification through application of immunohistochemistry and molecular diagnostics: past, present and future.

Authors:  Emily A Goebel; August Vidal; Xavier Matias-Guiu; C Blake Gilks
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 5.  Practical issues in the diagnosis of serous carcinoma of the endometrium.

Authors:  Sonia Gatius; Xavier Matias-Guiu
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 7.842

6.  Poor prognosis of uterine serous carcinoma compared with grade 3 endometrioid carcinoma in early stage patients.

Authors:  Ji Young Park; Joo-Hyun Nam; Young-Tak Kim; Yong-Man Kim; Jong-Hyeok Kim; Dae-Yeon Kim; Insuk Sohn; Shin-Wha Lee; Chang Ohk Sung; Kyu-Rae Kim
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2013-02-17       Impact factor: 4.064

7.  The occurrence of fetal microchimeric cells in endometrial tissues is a very common phenomenon in benign uterine disorders, and the lower prevalence of fetal microchimerism is associated with better uterine cancer prognoses.

Authors:  Ilona Hromadnikova; Katerina Kotlabova; Petra Pirkova; Pavla Libalova; Zdenka Vernerova; Bohuslav Svoboda; Eduard Kucera
Journal:  DNA Cell Biol       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 3.311

8.  Insights into endometrial serous carcinogenesis and progression.

Authors:  Oluwole Fadare; Wenxin Zheng
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2009-01-10

9.  Controversies in the management of endometrial cancer.

Authors:  V Masciullo; G Amadio; D Lo Russo; I Raimondo; A Giordano; G Scambia
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2010-06-16

10.  Interobserver Variability in the Diagnosis of Uterine High-Grade Endometrioid Carcinoma.

Authors:  Sumi Thomas; Yaser Hussein; Sudeshna Bandyopadhyay; Michele Cote; Oudai Hassan; Eman Abdulfatah; Baraa Alosh; Hui Guan; Robert A Soslow; Rouba Ali-Fehmi
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 5.534

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.