BACKGROUND: Culture and climate represent shared beliefs and values that may influence quality of care in health care teams, and which could be manipulated for quality improvement. However, there is a lack of agreement on the theoretical and empirical relationships between climate and culture, and their relative power as predictors of quality of care. This study sought to examine the association between self-report measures of climate and culture in primary care teams and comprehensive measures of quality of care. METHODS: The data were derived from a cross-sectional survey of 492 professionals in 42 general practices in England. Self-report measures of culture (the Competing Values Framework) and climate (the Team Climate Inventory) were used, together with validated measures of quality of care from medical records and self-report. RESULTS: The majority of practices could be characterized as 'clan' culture type. Practices with a dominant clan culture scored higher on climate for participation and teamwork. There were no associations between culture and quality of care, and only limited evidence of associations between climate and quality. CONCLUSIONS: The current analysis would not support the hypothesis that culture and climate are important predictors of quality of care in primary care. Although larger studies are required to provide a definitive test, the results may suggest the need for a more complex model of the associations between culture, climate and outcomes, and further research may be required into the interaction between culture and climate with other determinants of behaviour such as internal and external incentives.
BACKGROUND: Culture and climate represent shared beliefs and values that may influence quality of care in health care teams, and which could be manipulated for quality improvement. However, there is a lack of agreement on the theoretical and empirical relationships between climate and culture, and their relative power as predictors of quality of care. This study sought to examine the association between self-report measures of climate and culture in primary care teams and comprehensive measures of quality of care. METHODS: The data were derived from a cross-sectional survey of 492 professionals in 42 general practices in England. Self-report measures of culture (the Competing Values Framework) and climate (the Team Climate Inventory) were used, together with validated measures of quality of care from medical records and self-report. RESULTS: The majority of practices could be characterized as 'clan' culture type. Practices with a dominant clan culture scored higher on climate for participation and teamwork. There were no associations between culture and quality of care, and only limited evidence of associations between climate and quality. CONCLUSIONS: The current analysis would not support the hypothesis that culture and climate are important predictors of quality of care in primary care. Although larger studies are required to provide a definitive test, the results may suggest the need for a more complex model of the associations between culture, climate and outcomes, and further research may be required into the interaction between culture and climate with other determinants of behaviour such as internal and external incentives.
Authors: Michael Welton; David DeJoy; Maria Eugenia Castellanos; Mark Ebell; Ye Shen; Sara Robb Journal: J Racial Ethn Health Disparities Date: 2017-06-22
Authors: Rachel D A Havyer; Majken T Wingo; Nneka I Comfere; Darlene R Nelson; Andrew J Halvorsen; Furman S McDonald; Darcy A Reed Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2013-12-11 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Ross Bailie; Damin Si; Cindy Shannon; James Semmens; Kevin Rowley; David J Scrimgeour; Tricia Nagel; Ian Anderson; Christine Connors; Tarun Weeramanthri; Sandra Thompson; Robyn McDermott; Hugh Burke; Elizabeth Moore; Dallas Leon; Richard Weston; Haylene Grogan; Andrew Stanley; Karen Gardner Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2010-05-19 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: David M Shahian; Xiu Liu; Laura P Rossi; Elizabeth A Mort; Sharon-Lise T Normand Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2017-10-09 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Aleida G Huppelschoten; Noortje T L van Duijnhoven; Rosella P M G Hermens; Chris Verhaak; Jan A M Kremer; Willianne L D M Nelen Journal: Trials Date: 2012-09-24 Impact factor: 2.279