Literature DB >> 17591549

Preparation and biological evaluation of 111In-, 177Lu- and 90Y-labeled DOTA analogues conjugated to B72.3.

Huma Mohsin1, Jonathan Fitzsimmons, Tiffani Shelton, Timothy J Hoffman, Cathy S Cutler, Michael R Lewis, Phillip S Athey, Gyongyi Gulyas, Garry E Kiefer, R Keith Frank, Jaime Simon, Susan Z Lever, Silvia S Jurisson.   

Abstract

Three 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-N,N',N",N"'-tetraacetic acid (DOTA) analogues were evaluated for relative in vivo stability when radiolabeled with (111)In, (90)Y and (177)Lu and conjugated to the monoclonal antibody B72.3. The DOTA analogues evaluated were "NHS-DOTA" [N-hydroxysuccinimdyl (NHS) group activating one carboxylate], "Arm-DOTA" (also known as MeO-DOTA; with a p-NCS, o-MeO-benzyl moiety on the methylene group of one acetic acid arm) and "Back-DOTA" (with a p-NCS-benzyl moiety on a backbone methylene group of the macrocycle). The B72.3 was conjugated to the DOTA analogues to increase the retention time of the radioloabeled conjugates in vivo in mice. The serum stability of the various radiometalated DOTA conjugates showed them to have good stability out to 168 h (all >95% except (111)In-NHS-DOTA-B72.3, which was 91% stable). Hydroxyapatite stability for the (111)In and (177)Lu DOTA-conjugates was >95% at 168 h, while the (90)Y DOTA-conjugates were somewhat less stable (between 90% and 95% at 168 h). The biodistribution studies of the radiometalated DOTA-conjugates showed that no significant differences were observed for the (111)In and (177)Lu analogues; however, the (90)Y analogues showed lower stabilities, as evidenced by their increased bone uptake relative to the other two [2-20% injected dose per gram (% ID/g) for (90)Y and 2-8% ID/g for (111)In and (177)Lu]. The lower stability of the (90)Y analogues could be due to the higher beta energy of (90)Y and/or to the larger ionic radius of Y(3+). Based on the bone uptake observed, the (177)Lu-NHS-DOTA-B72.3 had slightly lower stability than the (177)Lu-Arm-DOTA-B72.3 and (177)Lu-Back-DOTA-B72.3, but not significantly at all time points. For (90)Y, the analogue showing the lowest stability based on bone uptake was (90)Y-Arm-DOTA-B72.3, perhaps because of the metal's larger ionic radius and potential steric interactions minimizing effective complexation. The (111)In analogues all showed similar biological distributions at the various time points. This study suggests that care must be taken when evaluating (90)Y-labeled antibodies and in using NHS-DOTA-antibody conjugates with (177)Lu. All evaluations should be extended to time points relevant to the half-life of the radiometal and the therapy applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17591549     DOI: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2007.03.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucl Med Biol        ISSN: 0969-8051            Impact factor:   2.408


  7 in total

1.  Metallic radionuclides in the development of diagnostic and therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals.

Authors:  Sibaprasad Bhattacharyya; Manish Dixit
Journal:  Dalton Trans       Date:  2011-05-03       Impact factor: 4.390

2.  Noninvasive PET Imaging of a Ga-68-Radiolabeled RRL-Derived Peptide in Hepatocarcinoma Murine Models.

Authors:  Yan Huo; Lei Kang; Xiaoxi Pang; Haoyuan Shen; Ping Yan; Chunli Zhang; Xuhe Liao; Xueqi Chen; Rongfu Wang
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Integrin targeted delivery of radiotherapeutics.

Authors:  Zhaofei Liu; Fan Wang; Xiaoyuan Chen
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 11.556

4.  Physicochemical Evaluation of Lyophilized Formulation of p-SCN-Bn-DOTA- and p-SCN-Bn-DTPA-rituximab for NHL Radio Immunotherapy.

Authors:  Darinka Gjorgieva Ackova; Katarina Smilkov; Emilija Janevik-Ivanovska
Journal:  Iran J Pharm Res       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.696

5.  Cross-Isotopic Bioorthogonal Tools as Molecular Twins for Radiotheranostic Applications.

Authors:  Veronika Rosecker; Christoph Denk; Melanie Maurer; Martin Wilkovitsch; Severin Mairinger; Thomas Wanek; Hannes Mikula
Journal:  Chembiochem       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 3.164

6.  T cell receptor-like recognition of tumor in vivo by synthetic antibody fragment.

Authors:  Keith R Miller; Akiko Koide; Brenda Leung; Jonathan Fitzsimmons; Bryan Yoder; Hong Yuan; Michael Jay; Sachdev S Sidhu; Shohei Koide; Edward J Collins
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Site-Specific 111In-Radiolabeling of Dual-PEGylated Porous Silicon Nanoparticles and Their In Vivo Evaluation in Murine 4T1 Breast Cancer Model.

Authors:  Dave Lumen; Simo Näkki; Surachet Imlimthan; Elisavet Lambidis; Mirkka Sarparanta; Wujun Xu; Vesa-Pekka Lehto; Anu J Airaksinen
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 6.321

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.