Literature DB >> 17589362

Knee arthroplasty in the young patient: survival in a community registry.

Terence J Gioe1, Clifford Novak, Penny Sinner, Wenjun Ma, Susan Mehle.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Operative options for the younger patient with an arthritic knee remain controversial. We prospectively followed 1047 patients 55 years old or younger who underwent knee arthroplasty in a community joint registry over a 14-year period. Patients were implanted with 1047 joints of three predominant designs by 48 surgeons in four hospitals associated with a community joint registry. The mean age for this cohort was 49.8 years, and 62.8% (657/1047) of the patients were female. There were a total of 73 revisions performed, 5.6% (37/653) in women and 9.2% (36/394) in men. Cemented TKAs performed best, with a cumulative revision rate of 15.5%, compared to 32.3% in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) patients and 34.1% in cementless designs. Men had a higher cumulative revision rate than women, 31.9% compared to 20.6%. Adjusting for implant type and gender, there was no difference in cumulative revision rate based on diagnosis (OA versus other) or age group (< or = 40, 41-45, 46-50, 51-55 years) or between cruciate-retaining and -substituting designs. Eighty five percent of cemented TKA implants survived at 14 years in the population under 55 years of age in this community registry. Cementless designs and UKA increased revision risk independently. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17589362     DOI: 10.1097/BLO.0b013e31812f79a9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  39 in total

1.  Prosthetic inlay resurfacing for the treatment of focal, full thickness cartilage defects of the femoral condyle: a bridge between biologics and conventional arthroplasty.

Authors:  Peter Bollars; Marc Bosquet; Bruno Vandekerckhove; François Hardeman; Johan Bellemans
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  What is the evidence for total knee arthroplasty in young patients?: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  James A Keeney; Selena Eunice; Gail Pashos; Rick W Wright; John C Clohisy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-09-03       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  The clinical outcome of revision knee replacement after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty versus primary total knee arthroplasty: 8-17 years follow-up study of 49 patients.

Authors:  Jaakko Järvenpää; Jukka Kettunen; Hannu Miettinen; Heikki Kröger
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Wear studies on the likely performance of CFR-PEEK/CoCrMo for use as artificial joint bearing materials.

Authors:  S C Scholes; A Unsworth
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2008-08-14       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 5.  Larger range of motion and increased return to activity, but higher revision rates following unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty in patients under 65: a systematic review.

Authors:  Laura J Kleeblad; Jelle P van der List; Hendrik A Zuiderbaan; Andrew D Pearle
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  History of previous knee surgery does not affect the clinical outcomes of primary total knee arthroplasty in an Asian population.

Authors:  Jason Beng Teck Lim; Bryan Loh; Hwei Chi Chong; Andrew Hwee Chye Tan
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-08

7.  Younger age increases the risk of early prosthesis failure following primary total knee replacement for osteoarthritis. A follow-up study of 32,019 total knee replacements in the Finnish Arthroplasty Register.

Authors:  Jaakko Julin; Esa Jämsen; Timo Puolakka; Yrjö T Konttinen; Teemu Moilanen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.717

8.  Mid-term results and factors affecting outcome of a metal-backed unicompartmental knee design: a case series.

Authors:  Thorsten M Seyler; Michael A Mont; Lawrence P Lai; Jipan Xie; David R Marker; Michael G Zywiel; Peter M Bonutti
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2009-10-26       Impact factor: 2.359

9.  Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for tricompartment osteoarthritis in octogenarians.

Authors:  Sks Marya; Rajiv Thukral
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.251

10.  Early outcomes of patella resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Warren J Clements; Lisa Miller; Sarah L Whitehouse; Stephen E Graves; Philip Ryan; Ross W Crawford
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.