Literature DB >> 17589343

Organ-specific differences in the function of MCP-1 and CXCR3 during cardiac and skin allograft rejection.

Zdenka Haskova1, Atsushi Izawa, Alan G Contreras, Evelyn Flynn, Gwenola Boulday, David M Briscoe.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chemokines are well-established to function in the recruitment of leukocytes into allografts in the course of rejection. Moreover, some studies have indicated that there are organ-specific differences in chemokine function, but the mechanism accounting for this difference is not known.
METHODS: Fully major histocompatibility complex-mismatched vascularized cardiac transplants or skin transplants were performed using BALB/c (H-2d), C57BL/6 (H-2b), MCP-1-/- (H-2b) and CXCR3-/- (H-2b) mice as donors or recipients. Also, skin grafts (H-2b) were placed onto SCID mice (H-2d) that received BALB/c splenocytes (H-2d) by adoptive transfer either at the time of transplantation, or after a period of 28 days.
RESULTS: Cardiac allografts in MCP-1-/- recipients survived significantly longer (P<0.0005) than wild-type (WT) controls. However, there was no prolongation of survival when MCP-1-/- grafts were used a donors in WT mice. In contrast, the absence of donor but not recipient MCP-1 prolonged skin allograft survival. WT donor cardiac grafts in CXCR3-/- recipients had a modest prolongation of survival (P<0.0005), whereas CXCR3-/- donor cardiac grafts in WT recipients were rejected similar to controls. Also, while recipient CXCR3 had no effect on the rejection of skin, CXCR3-/- donor skin grafts survived significantly longer than WT controls. This survival advantage was lost when vascularized CXCR3-/- skin grafts were used as donors in the SCID model of rejection.
CONCLUSION: Recipient derived MCP-1 and CXCR3 are functional in the rejection of vascularized, but not nonvascularized, allografts. In contrast, donor-derived MCP-1 and CXCR3 are functional in nonvascularized, but not vascularized grafts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17589343     DOI: 10.1097/01.tp.0000266892.69117.9a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  8 in total

1.  Memory T cells migrate to and reject vascularized cardiac allografts independent of the chemokine receptor CXCR3.

Authors:  Martin H Oberbarnscheidt; Jeffrey M Walch; Qi Li; Amanda L Williams; John T Walters; Rosemary A Hoffman; Anthony J Demetris; Craig Gerard; Geoffrey Camirand; Fadi G Lakkis
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 4.939

2.  Graft-derived CCL2 increases graft injury during antibody-mediated rejection of cardiac allografts.

Authors:  T Abe; C A Su; S Iida; W M Baldwin; N Nonomura; S Takahara; R L Fairchild
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 8.086

3.  Anti-CD45RB/anti-TIM-1-induced tolerance requires regulatory B cells.

Authors:  K M Lee; J I Kim; R Stott; J Soohoo; M R O'Connor; H Yeh; G Zhao; P Eliades; C Fox; N Cheng; S Deng; J F Markmann
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 8.086

4.  Prolongation of cardiac and islet allograft survival by a blocking hamster anti-mouse CXCR3 monoclonal antibody.

Authors:  Ravindra Uppaluri; Kathleen C F Sheehan; Liqing Wang; Jack D Bui; Joshua J Brotman; Bao Lu; Craig Gerard; Wayne W Hancock; Robert D Schreiber
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 4.939

5.  PI3Kgamma (PI3Kgamma) is essential for efficient induction of CXCR3 on activated T cells.

Authors:  Joseph Barbi; Hannah E Cummings; Bao Lu; Steve Oghumu; Thomas Rückle; Christian Rommel; William Lafuse; Caroline C Whitacre; Abhay R Satoskar
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 6.  Chemokine-directed strategies to attenuate allograft rejection.

Authors:  Austin D Schenk; Joshua M Rosenblum; Robert L Fairchild
Journal:  Clin Lab Med       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.935

7.  Gene expression profiling in acute allograft rejection: challenging the immunologic constant of rejection hypothesis.

Authors:  Tara L Spivey; Lorenzo Uccellini; Maria Libera Ascierto; Gabriele Zoppoli; Valeria De Giorgi; Lucia Gemma Delogu; Alyson M Engle; Jaime M Thomas; Ena Wang; Francesco M Marincola; Davide Bedognetti
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 5.531

8.  Noninvasive Monitoring of Allograft Rejection Using a Novel Epidermal Sampling Technique.

Authors:  Piul S Rabbani; William J Rifkin; Rohini L Kadle; Nakul Rao; J Rodrigo Diaz-Siso; Salma A Abdou; Eduardo D Rodriguez; Daniel J Ceradini
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-08-08
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.