Literature DB >> 17589251

Evolution of operative techniques for the treatment of single-suture metopic synostosis.

Jesse Selber1, Russell R Reid, Borris Gershman, Seema S Sonnad, Leslie N Sutton, Linton A Whitaker, Scott P Bartlett.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Primary orbitocranioplasty for metopic craniosynostosis encompasses a variety of techniques, with variable long-term success. The authors present a series illustrating the evolution of surgical techniques and its impact on surgical outcomes.
METHODS: All patients with single-suture metopic synostosis treated at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia from 1975-2004 were included. Demographic information, preoperative clinical findings, operative technique, postoperative complications, postoperative clinical findings, and length of follow-up were all recorded. Five techniques are presented, reflecting a transition from mere reshaping with metallic fixation to the increased use of primary bone grafting and resorbable fixation to expand the frontal region. Preoperative covariates and technique type were analyzed for effect on outcomes.
RESULTS: Eighty-six patients were identified. Mean follow-up was 50 months. In terms of esthetic outcome, patients with preoperative frontal irregularities had a higher incidence of postoperative deformities (P = 0.026). Patients with preoperative mean intercanthal distance <20 had a higher incidence of postoperative frontal irregularities (P = 0.045). Maximal expansion of the supraorbital bar via interpositional bone graft and stabilization of the construct with strategic bone grafting and resorbable fixation resulted in a lower incidence of postoperative temporal hollowing (P = 0.029). Patients with expansion and lateral reinforcement of the expanded bar had a lower incidence of reoperation (P = 0.026).
CONCLUSIONS: Undercorrection of metopic craniosynostosis is not an uncommon finding. To prevent long-term relapse, aggressive anterolateral expansion of the supraorbital bar via primary bone grafting and resorbable fixation with the overall goal of overcorrection may provide the best esthetic outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17589251     DOI: 10.1097/01.sap.0000264836.54760.32

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Plast Surg        ISSN: 0148-7043            Impact factor:   1.539


  10 in total

1.  Guideline for Care of Patients With the Diagnoses of Craniosynostosis: Working Group on Craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Irene M J Mathijssen
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.046

2.  Personalized Optimal Planning for the Surgical Correction of Metopic Craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Antonio R Porras; D Zukic; A Equobahrie; Gary F Rogers; Marius George Linguraru
Journal:  Clin Image Based Proced       Date:  2016-09-21

3.  Assessing aesthetic outcomes after trigonocephaly correction.

Authors:  Philipp Metzler; Wolfgang Zemann; Christine Jacobsen; Heinz-Theo Lübbers; Klaus Wilhelm Grätz; Joachim Anton Obwegeser
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-02-17

4.  Parallel angulated frontal bone slat cuts for treatment of metopic synostosis and other frontal skull deformities: the "cathedral dome procedure".

Authors:  Dachling Pang; John Zovickian; Sui-to Wong; Yong Jin Hou; Hop N Le
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 1.475

5.  Endoscope-assisted repair of metopic synostosis.

Authors:  Yusuf Erşahin
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 1.475

6.  Complications in the surgical treatment of craniosynostosis and craniofacial syndromes: apropos of 306 transcranial procedures.

Authors:  Javier Esparza; José Hinojosa
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2008-09-04       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 7.  Metopic synostosis.

Authors:  Jacques van der Meulen
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 1.475

8.  Trigonocephaly: A simple modified technique.

Authors:  Danish Mohammad; Sivashanmugam Dhandapani
Journal:  J Pediatr Neurosci       Date:  2014-05

9.  Outcomes of Surgical Management of Metopic Synostosis : A Retrospective Study of 18 Cases.

Authors:  Mohamed E Elhawary; Mohammed Adawi; Mohamed Gabr
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2021-09-08

10.  Effectiveness of Automatic Planning of Fronto-orbital Advancement for the Surgical Correction of Metopic Craniosynostosis.

Authors:  David García-Mato; Antonio R Porras; Santiago Ochandiano; Gary F Rogers; Roberto García-Leal; José I Salmerón; Javier Pascau; Marius George Linguraru
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-11-11
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.